Continue to Site

Welcome to EDAboard.com

Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

Circuit Protection Scheme

Status
Not open for further replies.

J_M_B

Junior Member level 2
Joined
Jul 24, 2015
Messages
23
Helped
0
Reputation
0
Reaction score
0
Trophy points
1
Activity points
239
Hi

I'm looking at adding protection to a small battery powered device.
The battery terminals will be touched by user.
The micro controller programming interface will be able to be touched by the user.

Its easy to google descriptions of varistors/MOVs/TVS diodes but I find it difficult to get an answer I'm happy with about what will be an effective protection scheme.

Essentialy my spec is:
- System must survive user touching battery terminals throughout the products life.
- System must survive user touching micro controller programming interface pins throughout its life
(Pins are system power, system GND, 3x micro controller pins)

I would really appreciate any thoughts on which components I should use to achieve the above specification.
Also any advice on resources App notes/textbooks I could use to educate myself so I could answer this question myself.

Thanks
Jamie
 

Hi,

specifications need values..

The problem is not "touching" a pin, but there may be an ESD voltage with a specific capacitance and a series resistor.
There are several models like "human body model" that fits best your needs with "touching". Charged device models and different machine models...

So you need to know:
* voltage
* capacitance
* resistance

With a human body model one typically uses 100...300pF of capacitance and about 1500 Ohms as series resistance.
And the (withstand) voltage is often the result (or the variable) of the ESD Test.

Klaus
 

Hi Klaus

Thanks for the message.
Ok so based on what youve said, what forms of protection would you add to this system?

After reading I have settled on Unidirectional TVS diodes on the positive battery terminal and on each of the microcontroller data lines.

- Does this sound reasonable to you?
- I'm still not clear why everything I have read tends towards TVS rather than MOV based solution, any thoughts on this?
- The system 3V3 is also exposed to the user on the programming header, would you add TVS on the 3V3 net aswell?

Thanks for your help
Jamie
 

Hi,

For the relatively sensitive signal pins (in opposite to the power supply pins) I often use two resistors.

One resistor is used to limit the current and dissipate the power. It should be one with a higher voltage rating and it should withstand power bursts. Here carbon resistors have an improvement against metal oxide resistors.
Then there should be a fast voltage limiting device (to Gnd). If you look into the datasheet you will see that the limiting voltage is much higher than 3.3V + 0.5V. So a microcontroller internal protection diode may be conductive.
Because of this I use a second resistor between voltage limiting device and microcontroller.
Maybe the limiting voltage is 8V then you could use a resistor of about 47 Ohms to keep peak current below 100mA.
Voltage rating and power rating is not critical.

Klaus
 
  • Like
Reactions: J_M_B

    J_M_B

    Points: 2
    Helpful Answer Positive Rating
Hi Klaus

Thats great, thanks for the explanation

Jamie
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

Part and Inventory Search

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top