Continue to Site

Welcome to EDAboard.com

Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

HFSS lumped port not equivalent to lumped RLC boundary condition

Status
Not open for further replies.

morskie_oko

Newbie level 3
Joined
Mar 30, 2011
Messages
3
Helped
0
Reputation
0
Reaction score
0
Trophy points
1,281
Activity points
1,304
Hi,

I have a design with 2 waveports and 1 lumped RLC surface that simulates a capacitor. I have changed the RLC surface into a lumped port to have a 3x3 Z matrix, this way I can change the values of the lumped capacitor in post processing and reduce the 3x3 matrix down to a 2x2 matrix :

V1 = Z11*I1 + Z12*I2 + Z13*I3;
V2 = Z21*I1 + Z22*I2 + Z23*I3; + V3 * (1i*2*pi*C) = I3 -> V1 = Z11' *I1 + Z12' *I2;
V3 = Z31*I1 + Z32*I2 + Z33*I3; V2 = Z21' *I1 + Z22' *I2;


The problem is that I get different results when I simulate the project with lumped RLC than when I simulate the project with a lumped port and I reduce the Z matrix in post-processing (matlab). Anybody know what am I doing wrong?

Thanks
 

Hi morskie_oko,

This may just be a typo, but (1i*2*pi*C) does not equate to an impedance. I assume that you're only doing this at one frequency?
 

Hi PlanarMetamaterials,

indeed, it is a typo, I meant (1i*2*pi*f*C).
 

It looks correct, can you provide a picture so that I can make sure I understand your setup?
 
Last edited:

Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top