Continue to Site

Welcome to EDAboard.com

Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

Register Log in

Why no thermal paste used between heatsink and LED MCPCB?

Status
Not open for further replies.
T

treez

Guest
The following mains LED lightbulb contains no thermal paste between the LED MCPCB and the main heatsink. Surely this is a serious assembly error?

You can see the lack of thermal paste from time 6:30 of the following video
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YLlpoZaBx-g

I mean, why have they gone to such trouble to make such an elaborately shaped heatsink, and then not bothereed to use a complete layer of thermal paste between LED MCPCB and heatsink?
 

Interesting. Hmmmm....
Well it could be that the blobs of compound are enough with a good heatsink. After all too much compound is worse than none.
It could be designed to work with just the flat surfaces so the compound is a bonus?
Cynically it could be that it works but the light performance degrades faster due to the higher operating temperatures and you have to buy a new bulb in 2 or 3 years and who will have the receipt to get a refund?

Thanks for showing the video, these tear downs can be interesting.
 
  • Like
Reactions: treez

    T

    Points: 2
    Helpful Answer Positive Rating
i'd say thermal paste is expensive, and they've skimped on it.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

Part and Inventory Search

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top