Continue to Site

Welcome to EDAboard.com

Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

Register Log in

General Purpose Op-amp

Status
Not open for further replies.
rahdirs

rahdirs

Advanced Member level 1
Joined
May 22, 2013
Messages
424
Helped
93
Reputation
192
Reaction score
91
Trophy points
1,308
Location
Mordor
Activity points
4,492
Hi all,

I have been using IC 741 in my circuits and just recently found that 741 has become old with bad specs in terms of Bandwidth etc....I do not mean to say it has become obsolete,it is still usable & a very good op-amp.
But which op-amp would be best suited to replace Ic 741.I'm talking about in general all specs, bandwidth,gain at high freq.,slew-rate,power,voltage-swing???
Would LM 358 fit the above cause ???

regards.
 
Last edited:

LM358 has the advantage of working in single-supply applications, input common range including negative rail, output voltage near to negative rail. But due to class B output stage it shows considerable crossover distortions which make it at bad choice for audio applications.

Personally, I've been using TL071 (and the respective dual and quad devices) for standard applications since "ever", which outcompetes uA741 in effectively any specification (except for a slightly higher offset voltage of the cheapest standard variant). And LM358/LM324 for single supply or low power applications that don't need TL071 gain linearity, low input current and low noise.
 
  • Like
Reactions: rahdirs

    rahdirs

    rahdirs

    Points: 2
    Helpful Answer Positive Rating
I like CA3140, CA3240, CA3160;
CA3130 is faster but can require
external frequency compensation.

NE5532 and NE5534 are fast, low cost and very
good for audio and general purpose
but not for single-supply operation.
 

aProgrammer said:
NE5532 and NE5534 are fast, low cost and very
good for audio and general purpose
but not for single-supply operation.
Click to expand...

Hi aProgrammer,

why not for single-supply operation? Do you have corresponding experience?
 

I agree that NE5532 and TL071/2/4 are good, low cost opamps.

Here's something to bear in mind when choosing an opamp for a particular circuit: As a rule of thumb, JFET-input opamps (e.g. TL072) generally have higher input offset voltage and higher voltage noise than BJT-input opamps (e.g. NE5532). However they have lower input offset current and lower current noise.

Thus JFET-input opamps tend to be best for circuits with high source impedance, while BJT-input opamps tend to be better for circuits with low source impedance.

- - - Updated - - -

Quick comparison of typical values:

NE5532TL074
Voltage noise5nV/SQRT(Hz)18nV/SQRT(Hz)
Current noise0.7pA/SQRT(Hz)0.01pA/SQRT(Hz)
Input offset voltage0.5mV3mV
Input offset current10nA5pA
 
Last edited:

@FvM: I see in the data-sheet of LM 358 that "Differential Input Voltage Range Equal to Maximum-Rated Supply Voltage . . . 32 V".
Does this mean if i'm using LM 358 with single supply of 32 V,can i apply input voltage of 0 V or 32 V????
 

Does this mean if i'm using LM 358 with single supply of 32 V,can i apply input voltage of 0 V or 32 V????
Click to expand...
It means in other words that any voltage level within power supply rails is permitted for both input terminals. This is of course a maximum ratings specification and doesn't say anything about reasonable operation conditions, e.g. common mode range.

It should be mentioned, that BJT input stages don't neccessarily tolerate high differential input voltages because they might exceed the reverse Vbe rating. Some OPs have dedicated protection circuits to protect the input stage, e.g. utilizing clamping diodes. Others like µA741 or LM358 use a circuit topology with higher reverse rating. In "normal" amplifier operation, the differential input voltage is about zero, so you probably never activate this clamping circuit.
 
  • Like
Reactions: rahdirs

    rahdirs

    rahdirs

    Points: 2
    Helpful Answer Positive Rating
A 741 is 45 years old. It was designed for a 30V supply and for DC and low frequencies. Audio was not considered but maybe for telephone quality.
An LM358 or LM324 are also very old but they were the FIRST low power opamps. Therefore they have crossover distortion and work poorly above 2kHz. They are also noisy (hisssss).

A TL07x is selected for low noise and works with a supply from 7V to 36V. It has very low distortion and works perfectly up to 100kHz.
Millions of them are used in audio products so they are inexpensive.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

Part and Inventory Search

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top