+ Post New Thread
Results 1 to 14 of 14

10th September 2004, 09:37 #1
 Join Date
 Mar 2004
 Posts
 174
 Helped
 5 / 5
 Points
 2,891
 Level
 12
nulling resistor
Hi all,
From paper/text, it usually needs a compensation cap and a nulling resistor(normally realized by transistor biased in linear region) in twostage op amp. The usual placement is as follows:
output of first stagecapresistoroutput of second stage
could we switch the cap and the resistor like the below?
output of first stageresistorcapoutput of second stage
If not, please give me your reasons. Many Thanks. :)
regards,
jordan76

Advertisement

10th September 2004, 09:42 #2
 Join Date
 Aug 2004
 Posts
 34
 Helped
 0 / 0
 Points
 1,750
 Level
 9
cmos nulling resistor
i have designed a opamp with the second way, the result of simulaton is good,

10th September 2004, 09:52 #3
 Join Date
 Mar 2004
 Posts
 174
 Helped
 5 / 5
 Points
 2,891
 Level
 12
nulling resistor in opamp compensation
Hi dwang_w,
Thanks for your prompt reply! :)
What about the silicon testing result?
Did it match your simulation result well?
And is there any difference between those two methods?
regards,
jordan76

10th September 2004, 15:25 #4
 Join Date
 Jun 2001
 Posts
 185
 Helped
 25 / 25
 Points
 3,518
 Level
 13
pl 26 resistor
If you use a real resistor (NOT a MOS), I think that the results should be EXACTLY the same.
When you use a MOS transistor in triode the Rds depends on the biasing conditions > putting it on the 1st stage side or in the second stage side may lead to different Rds. But as long as you tune the MOS dimensions to have the Rds right value, it should be indifferent.
Regards

10th September 2004, 15:41 #5
pl 25 resistor
I think 2nd way is better
Because Resistors are more sensitive to node voltage than Cap, and the voltage swing at output node of 1st stage is smaller than that of 2nd stage. Besides, many designs place the resistor at the output node of 1st stage

Advertisement

10th September 2004, 18:19 #6
 Join Date
 Jun 2001
 Posts
 185
 Helped
 25 / 25
 Points
 3,518
 Level
 13
2 stage op amp nulling resistor
You're right ablue, that is a good reason to put the MOS acting as a resistor connected to the first stage.

Advertisement

11th September 2004, 06:26 #7
 Join Date
 Aug 2004
 Posts
 34
 Helped
 0 / 0
 Points
 1,750
 Level
 9
where to place a resistor to make an op amp ideal
the result of is good

11th September 2004, 11:04 #8
 Join Date
 Mar 2004
 Posts
 174
 Helped
 5 / 5
 Points
 2,891
 Level
 12
what is a nulling resistor
Thanks guys!
I also think the second way is better for MOS resistor :)
But if I use real resistor, should the two approaches get the exact same results?
regards,
jordan76

12th September 2004, 02:50 #9
what is a nulling resistor
I think ablue said is very correct, because add the null resistor is to move the RHZ to very large point or RLZ, which make the PM increase. It's principle is make the zero from Gm/Cc to 1/((Rz1/Gm)Cc), so select Rz larger or equal the 1/Gm to increase the PM. If use MOS as resistor, then it need guarntee the MOS risistor larger than 1/Gm. so the 2nd mos is more stable to get a stable resistor.
Originally Posted by ablue

12th September 2004, 03:37 #10
 Join Date
 Mar 2004
 Posts
 174
 Helped
 5 / 5
 Points
 2,891
 Level
 12
ldo nulling resistor
rambus_ddr,
Thanks for your detailed analysis!
My another question:
If I use real resistor instead of MOS resistor, are the two approches exactly same?
I guess maybe it is better to use the first approach in this case.
Please correct me if I am wrong. Thanks!
regards,
jordan76

12th September 2004, 05:40 #11
nulling resistor ldo
If you want to move the zero to a large, then need make the resistor equal to 1/Gm, but since the resistor affected by Process, voltage and temperature, so not guarantee the equal, and use the mos as resistor may guarentee the same variable with the second Gm, so if possible, i think the mos is better.
Originally Posted by jordan76

Advertisement

12th September 2004, 06:32 #12
 Join Date
 Nov 2001
 Location
 US
 Posts
 832
 Helped
 264 / 264
 Points
 9,718
 Level
 23
two stage opamp
There is also another point of view to the question where to put the MOS resistor. The zero compensating resistor should be either equal to 1/Gm if we want to move the zero to + infinity or larger than 1/Gm if we need to move the zero in the LHP and make it a good zero. Here Gm is the transconductance of the second stage. However, with process, temperature and weather conditions the value of the MOS resistor will move or 1/Gm will move and it may happen that we don't compensate it as we intended. Because the Rz should be with some relation to 1/Gm and also because to first order Ron of MOS (when transistor is in triode) is equal to 1/Gm (if this same transistor is in saturation), we need to make the size of the driving transistor of the second stage correlated to the size of the MOS transistor playing the role of Rz. This also means we need to provide the same VgsVt for both. In turn this means that if we provide a bias for the gate of the Rz MOS transistor equal to 2Vgs of the driving transistor and connect the Rz MOST at the output of the first stage (which is the gate of the driving transistor of the second stage), this will guarantee that both transistors work with the same Vgs and also track each other.

13th September 2004, 06:03 #13
 Join Date
 May 2004
 Posts
 874
 Helped
 70 / 70
 Points
 7,066
 Level
 20
1gm transistor
You can read the allen's book: CMOS analog circuit design.
There is a chapt. to talk about this topic

3rd October 2004, 05:38 #14
 Join Date
 Apr 2004
 Posts
 176
 Helped
 20 / 20
 Points
 2,652
 Level
 12
opamp nulling
I think if you use resistor other than MOS, the second approach also better since many resistor depends on biasing conditions (e.g. diffusion resistor, and even poly resistor has some very small dependency). Connect the resistor at the output will produce some nonlinearity if they are depends on biasing condition.
+ Post New Thread
Please login