Continue to Site

Welcome to EDAboard.com

Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

Describing the stop bandwidth of a filter using S11 and S12 parameters

Status
Not open for further replies.

snkhan

Full Member level 6
Joined
Oct 19, 2005
Messages
324
Helped
38
Reputation
74
Reaction score
20
Trophy points
1,298
Location
Gods place
Activity points
3,213
while considering the stop bandwidth of a filter one should describe in terms of S11 or S21.
 

Re: S11 Vs S21 @ Filters

It basically depends on the application. S21 provides the description of the filter, while S11 (matching) in the stop is upon the application specifications.
 

Re: S11 Vs S21 @ Filters

S21 provides the description of the filter

So if i want to describe the bandwidth of a filter, should it be describe in term of S11 or S2
 

Re: S11 Vs S21 @ Filters

Both.
In an ideal two-port loss-free network |S11|^2=1-|S21|^2.
You must just check the band in which the |S11| is below a specified value
(e.g. |S11| < -26 dB).
That range of frequency is the passing band.
 

Re: S11 Vs S21 @ Filters

Filter bandwidth is defined by S21. To match filter in a circuit you should use a filter by low S11, (S11 ~ 0). I agree with Aleksej.
 

Re: S11 Vs S21 @ Filters

s11 characterizes the filter when looking at the input. s21 is a characterization of the through and insertion loss. To add more confusion, there are numerous definitions of bandwidth that are often applied. Decide which one you want.
 

Re: S11 Vs S21 @ Filters

I think the bandwidth be measured in S21 similar as group delay
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top