Continue to Site

Welcome to EDAboard.com

Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

How to draw antenna diode to protect mosfet from antenna effect?

Status
Not open for further replies.

henrywent

Member level 5
Joined
Dec 29, 2008
Messages
83
Helped
5
Reputation
10
Reaction score
5
Trophy points
1,288
Location
china
Activity points
1,869
hi there,
how to draw antenna diode to protect mosfet from antenna effect. I don't see any diode pcell dedicated to this purpose. Can we use normal diode pcell from the PDK to achieve the function. ANY LINK OR DOCUMENT IS WELCOMED! Thanks in advance!
 

antenna diode

Hi

If I am not mistaken, you can use a standard diode to avoid antenna effect. Or just change metal layers near the poly to avoid damage on the gates.
 

    henrywent

    Points: 2
    Helpful Answer Positive Rating
anteena diodes

Hi,

If the violations number is not large, you can change the metal route layer to solve this problem. (prefer to change it as upper level metal/via layer)
 

    henrywent

    Points: 2
    Helpful Answer Positive Rating
antenna diode+antenna violation

Hi,
Well usually antenna diodes are created using the NMOS available in the PDK. Just short the source and the drain of the NMOS and connect it to the signal. While the Gate has to be grounded...

signal >---------------
s| | d
|____|
-------
g |
|
GND

The width of the NMOS can be 3 to 5 times the minumum width, which helps to overcome the gate to metal ratio of the antenna violation.

Hope this helps...
 

    henrywent

    Points: 2
    Helpful Answer Positive Rating
antenna diode +layer jumping

Goldeneagle said:
Hi,
... Just short the source and the drain of the NMOS and connect it to the signal. While the Gate has to be grounded...

signal >---------------
s| | d
|____|
-------
g |
|
GND

Hope this helps...
Don't think so. Isn't this a cap, rather than a diode? ;-)
 

antenna diode effect

erikl said:
Don't think so. Isn't this a cap, rather than a diode? ;-)

If I am not wrong, the Source and the Drain act as the diffusion diodes to sink in the extra charges due to the antenna effect. Connecting the gate to ground avoids the channel formation.
Taking a small metal jump to the higher level is the first step that should be tried, rather than adding antenna diodes which leads to reverse bias leakages (and especially on the switching nodes).
 

antenna diode on analog signals

ravirajdv said:
... If I am not wrong, the Source and the Drain act as the diffusion diodes to sink in the extra charges due to the antenna effect.
Yes, this is true; I forgot the bulk diode effect. This diode would "swallow" negative charges. Ion etching, however, delivers positive charges. So a p+ in nwell diode - or a PMOS - should be used (nwell connected to VDD). During metal etch, the nwell is close to GND potential.
 

+nmos diode

erikl said:
ravirajdv said:
... If I am not wrong, the Source and the Drain act as the diffusion diodes to sink in the extra charges due to the antenna effect.
Yes, this is true; I forgot the bulk diode effect. This diode would "swallow" negative charges. Ion etching, however, delivers positive charges. So a p+ in nwell diode - or a PMOS - should be used (nwell connected to VDD). During metal etch, the nwell is close to GND potential.

Hi erikl,
Are NMOS devices not sufficient?
I have not seen anybody using the PMOS devices in addition.
Reasons:
1> Since it is connected to VDD, more reverse bias leakage.
2> More area.

Do you see any other reasons, Process issues? (please throw some light)

Regards,
RDV
 

antenna diode edaboard

erikl said:
Ion etching, however, delivers positive charges. So a p+ in nwell diode - or a PMOS - should be used (nwell connected to VDD).

ravirajdv said:
Hi erikl, Are NMOS devices not sufficient?
An n+ on p diode won't avoid the build-up of a positive voltage level possibly high enough to destroy the gate oxide.

ravirajdv said:
I have not seen anybody using the PMOS devices in addition.
Not necessarily in addition. NMOS diode only. I did! ;-)

ravirajdv said:
Reasons:
1> Since it is connected to VDD, more reverse bias leakage.
Why? I don't see a reason for this.

ravirajdv said:
2> More area.
Minimum allowed area is sufficient for an antenna diode.

ravirajdv said:
Do you see any other reasons, Process issues? (please throw some light)
Regards,
RDV
Hi RDV, pls. s. my reason above. Process issue: yes! The etching ions are charged positively (as ions use to be ;-) ), so obviously they tend to build up positive voltage levels rather than negative ones.
Cheers, erikl
 

antenna diode size

erikl said:
erikl said:
Ion etching, however, delivers positive charges. So a p+ in nwell diode - or a PMOS - should be used (nwell connected to VDD).

ravirajdv said:
Hi erikl, Are NMOS devices not sufficient?
An n+ on p diode won't avoid the build-up of a positive voltage level possibly high enough to destroy the gate oxide.

ravirajdv said:
I have not seen anybody using the PMOS devices in addition.
Not necessarily in addition. NMOS diode only. I did! ;-)

ravirajdv said:
Reasons:
1> Since it is connected to VDD, more reverse bias leakage.
Why? I don't see a reason for this.

ravirajdv said:
2> More area.
Minimum allowed area is sufficient for an antenna diode.

ravirajdv said:
Do you see any other reasons, Process issues? (please throw some light)
Regards,
RDV
Hi RDV, pls. s. my reason above. Process issue: yes! The etching ions are charged positively (as ions use to be ;-) ), so obviously they tend to build up positive voltage levels rather than negative ones.
Cheers, erikl

Hey erikl,
By more leakage I mean, the NWELL is tied to VDD and hence the reverse biased diode so formed with the substrate will have the reverse biased current. If there is a nmos, we can avoid this.
By more area I mean, compared to the nmos device pmos device would take more area because of the nwell.
Thanks.
Regards,
RDV
 

antenna gate diffusion area

ravirajdv said:
Hey erikl,
By more leakage I mean, the NWELL is tied to VDD and hence the reverse biased diode so formed with the substrate will have the reverse biased current. If there is a nmos, we can avoid this.
By more area I mean, compared to the nmos device pmos device would take more area because of the nwell.
Thanks.
Regards,
RDV
Hi RDV,
the reverse current of a p+ on nwell diode is not determined by the nwell area, but by the area of the p+ diffusion (in the nwell), and this can be the minimum area allowed by DRC rules. Hence the reverse current shouldn't be greater than that of a minimum size n+ on substrate diode.
Cheers, erikl
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top