Continue to Site

Welcome to EDAboard.com

Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

Register Log in

Bipolar ICs more robust than CMOS ICs?

Status
Not open for further replies.
E

eem2am

Banned
Joined
Jun 22, 2008
Messages
1,179
Helped
37
Reputation
74
Reaction score
24
Trophy points
1,318
Activity points
0
Hi , is their a bipolar version of the 74LV123, and would it be generally more robust against latch-up and damage from transients etc?


74LV123 DATASHEET:
**broken link removed**
 

Some older bipolar 74 series parts were known for bad latchup
problems. You might want to check NASA components testing,
they do a lot of it looking for latchup (from another source than
you probably mean, but it's more challenging than just pin
electrical (over)stimulus.

It's going to vary by manufacturer, family and fab.
 
  • Like
Reactions: eem2am

    E

    eem2am

    Points: 2
    Helpful Answer Positive Rating
Thanks,

i must dmit , i sort of always assume that the most delicate thing in electronics is a fet gate.

and therfore, CMOS would generally always be less robust than biploar IC's?
 

eem2am said:
... is there a bipolar version of the 74LV123
Click to expand...
Sure: if you don't want to arrange for CMOS handling precautions, you can use its bipolar ancestors:
74123, 74[A][L]S123 : 74LS123
 
  • Like
Reactions: eem2am

    E

    eem2am

    Points: 2
    Helpful Answer Positive Rating
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

Part and Inventory Search

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top