Continue to Site

Welcome to EDAboard.com

Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

substrate biasing and Multi-Vt cells

Status
Not open for further replies.

vikram789

Member level 3
Joined
Aug 1, 2008
Messages
59
Helped
2
Reputation
4
Reaction score
2
Trophy points
1,288
Activity points
1,671
What is the different between following low power implementation techniques:-

1.using multi-Vt cells. e,g. Low Vt , High Vt
2. using substrate biasing
 

Hi Vikram,

1. Multi-vt cells are realized just by changing thickness of gate oxide layer to alter subthreshold voltage of a MOS transisitor.

2. In Substrate biasing, the fourth terminal of MOS is used to vary subthreshold voltage(VT) of a MOS transistor. Here you need extra power rail to control VT. This technique is complex when compared to 1).

Regards,
Eshwar.
 
Hi Eshwar,

I agree with you but my concern was that final result obtained is same in both cases.

Thanks
Vikram
 

you can analyse these 2 techniques from various perspective
1. Die area / design cost / silicon cost :
sub-strate biasing need control logics to be added in design.so it is complex design and need extra circuitry. more circuit --> more devices-- > extra die area -> extra silicon cost

but multi -Vt are fairly easy to implement as compared to sub-strate biaising

2. Performance :
substrate biasing has a much finer performance than Multi-Vt designs.

so this is also a typical cost vs performance scenario.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top