Continue to Site

Welcome to EDAboard.com

Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

Register Log in

How to choose material for RF PCB?

Status
Not open for further replies.
N

neerajs

Junior Member level 3
Joined
Nov 21, 2003
Messages
26
Helped
2
Reputation
4
Reaction score
0
Trophy points
1,281
Activity points
294
rf pcb materials

What all I need to consider to choose PCB material (dielectric, copper thickness...) for a radio board which need to operate from 2G to 6G.. 50ohm RF signals. Is FR-4 good enough considering it is the most common PCB material available?
 

roger pcb

FR4 is very poor and only used where cost is more important than performance. Gtek is better and only slightly more costly. If performance is important, use the traditional materials such as those from Rogers Corp.

**broken link removed**
 

pcb er

Rogers is great supplier. However, beside loss you sometimes might have to consider some other details such as dimension of the circuit (then you will go for high Er to reduce size), manufacturing tolerance (then you will go for thicker substrate to make line wider) etc.

flyhigh
 

roger pcb material

but i have questions ,if simply considered for circuits better performance,what the fundamentals?
 

er pcb

Yes,the PCB materia supplied by Rogers is very good.But it is more expensive than RF4.
You can use the kind of material that the dielectric
equal to 2.2.It is very stable .




Good Luck.
 

rf pcb material

for no high power required ,FR4 is ok. It is cheap.
Often used for mixed-signal PCB.Dielectric constant often 4.2to 4.7 .
If for PA board, less loss material is needed.
 

rogers pcb material

Hi,

You should use Roger R4003 with an Er of 3.35 it is perfect for this freq range, it all depents on what you are designing on the PCB.. if you plan to make more than just 50 Ohm lines than you should go for this material otherwise use GTek which is cheaper but still better than FR4..

The problem with FR4 is not only the loss but the Er it is not defined and thus varies depending on supplier. The Er of FR4 can be anything between 4 and 5 and this will make complex structures on FR4 impossible...

If you make a PA and you plan to use a matching network on the PCB you should go for R4003..

Paul.
 

rf materials

Roger product is good but expensive. Since your design is only up to 6 GHz, you can consider using Roger RO4350 (er=3.48) as the price is the cheapest among Roger products. Though FR4 is cheap but it is very lossy at 6 GHz. RO4350/RO4003 is recomended. Attached is the product spec.
 

pcb rf materials

Except Rogers there is also another company.
ARLON. Does anyone paid some comment to this one?
I know this one has same characterister with rogers in RF PCB material in high requirement level.
 

    V

    Points: 2
    Helpful Answer Positive Rating
pcb dielectric constant rf

FR4 is not suitable for operating frequency over 3GHz because of lose.
 

fr4 rogers

Can anyone explain the procedure of selecting the PCB material with particular Er with respect to frequency?

Lets say if I wanna design some PCB in freq range 9 to 11 GHz then how to choose Er and then PCB material?

Please help me in understanding.
 

pcb material for rf

Please ggogle for RT duroid copper clad for microwave frequencies and you get the first link from Rogers as PDF.

if you can check this link, you would get the right type
It is well informed already by others that Rogers is the best source.
 

rogers circuit board material

Depends on the design. If you need something very thin with high dielectric, you'll choose based on that. If you need something very low loss at a certain frequency, choose based on that. Rogers makes lots of good, general purpose composites. If you need higher Er I think Dupont makes some good low-loss, high Er boards but they're more expensive.

If you're going really high frequency there are specialty composites for that, too. Just google around and you'll find info. Rogers is good, Arlon makes some quality materials, FR4 is cheap, etc etc.
 

rogers fr4

mvs sarma said:
Please ggogle for RT duroid copper clad for microwave frequencies and you get the first link from Rogers as PDF.

if you can check this link, you would get the right type
It is well informed already by others that Rogers is the best source.
Click to expand...

Thanx Sir for providing the relevant information about the material........I have just started in this field......it will be helpful if u could also provide some link where I can learn designing of RF PCB layout from scratch.
 

rogers pcb for rf design

for so high freq, it is very sensitive. FR4 should not be a choice.
 
Hi guys, I'm new here.

If the purpose of PCB design for high frequency up to 20GHz, which Roger material suitable to be use? And how we want to relate between the performance of PCB board with the Dielectric Constant?
 

RO4350B 10mil 1/2oz is ok up to 20GHz.

Dielectric costant is relate to trace width. When you simulate, you must use it
 
azim.roslan said:
And how we want to relate between the performance of PCB board with the Dielectric Constant?
Click to expand...

Bigger εr means that for the same elelectrical length, the physical line length shrinks. Depending on your etching tolerances, it might be better to use small εr with longer lines, to reduce the relative error from manufacturing.

Same for the dielectric height: for a given line impedance, thin substrate means that your line width and gap width shrinks. If you need coupled lines for filter, check if these can be realized for the given substrate height. If gaps and lines would be too narrow, a thicker substrate might be the solution. If you need vias through the substrate, thinner substrate will give smaller inductance.
 

Re: pcb rf materials

I use Arlon, the material is not so rigid as Rogers, but I always get good results, and is easier to manufacture with a Milling Machine or LASER.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

Part and Inventory Search

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top