Continue to Site

Welcome to EDAboard.com

Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

[100pts] Signal analysis - need progressive material to read

Status
Not open for further replies.

mouzid

Full Member level 5
Joined
Jun 22, 2007
Messages
248
Helped
9
Reputation
18
Reaction score
0
Trophy points
1,296
Activity points
2,876
[100pts] Signal analysis

Hello Edaborders,

I'll give 20pts for the best reply to each question.


I have no experience nor ideas how to analyse signals. I wanna measure, decide and prove whether a signal is good or bad.


1- For the moment I plotted the frequency of my signal vs time. The signal is stable at 12 MHz. Actually, according to the figure, it is 12 Mhz +/- 0.04 %.
Is it a good signal ?

2- Oscillations are between 12.005 MHz and 11.995 MHz. The corresponding period is respectively 80.32 ns and 80.33 ns.
Can I say that the jitter of the signal 0.01 ns ?

3- Can I extract other usefull informations from the figure ?

4- What are the creteria that let me say that the signal is good ?

5- Will the study of this signal in the frequency domain bring more information ?

Could someone refert me to the necessary progressive material to read in order to understand that issue.
 

[100pts] Signal analysis

You need to define some specifications and then compare this signal versus your specs. Then, and only then, you can decide wether your signal is "good" or not!

2- Yes.
5- Yes, it will allow you to see if there are systematic patterns.
 

    mouzid

    Points: 2
    Helpful Answer Positive Rating
Re: [100pts] Signal analysis

Hi all,


1- Good or bad depends on your application requirements
2- The maximum jitter is 0.01ns but you'd better find also the other jitter's figures
3- As it is ? No.
4- You have to consider jitter and noise
5- Sure.
 

    mouzid

    Points: 2
    Helpful Answer Positive Rating
[100pts] Signal analysis

I don't understand, how the frequency measurement shown in the plot could be derived from a real signal. Can you clarify?
 

    mouzid

    Points: 2
    Helpful Answer Positive Rating
Re: [100pts] Signal analysis

Hi all,

Thanks JoannesPaulus and Advares for your replies. Could you please elabore the last two points ?

Please feel free to post your comments and replies.

FvM said:
I don't understand, how the frequency measurement shown in the plot could be derived from a real signal. Can you clarify?

Thanks FvM. I'm sure that other member like you didn't get my questions.
The signal In the figure comes really from a real signal. It represents the Frequency vs Time of a PLL output in a very small time window when the PLL is locked. (Please se figure below)
 

[100pts] Signal analysis

Thank you for the clarification. So I think, that the displayed graph has to be smoothed respectively low-pass filtered to represent a meaningful signal parameter. Details e.g. shorter than a signal period must be rather considered as noise, they can't represent a frequency. This has be considered, when calculating e.g. a jitter. As another problem, a jitter specification must be referred to a period, e. g. cycle-to-cycle or specified long-term.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top