Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.
These are Namiki's original papers. The method described there is stable but has large numerical errors
for larger time steps.
When I tested it (I used the method described in this papers) the main results were
- stability OK
- speed *slower* than FDTD for acceptble errors (< 5%)
when I increased dt to get the same computation speed then there were 20-50% errors.
Part of the problem may have been the implementation, but I find it difficult to believe
that you can get too much out of the older ADI methods.
I don't know about newer mthods. There are papers (I cannot recall them right now) which
claim that they have solved the large-error-for-larger-dt problem but I have not tried them.
My advice is to first make sure that you really want/need ADI-FDTD before you start
implementing it. I may sound very negative but I really would like to learn about a ADI
success story but so far have not heard of any such.
I think that it is most difficult to implement PML in ADI-FDTD.
Hello smruti,
I will appreciate if you please share with me the ADI code written in C. I severely need that one in c or c++. My email is irfan20uk@yahoo.com
Thanks
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
