T
treez
Guest
The following are the most common current mode full-bridge SMPS control chips in the world for 90-265VAC input SMPS’s….
UCC3808, LM5030, LM5037 , UC3846, LTC3721-1
None of these chips has output overload protection. By “output overload protection”, I mean that if the error amplifer internal to them is railed high for more than 1 second, then these chips do *not* latch off.
Most offline flyback smps chips have this facility, so why do none of the full-bridge smps chips have this?
LM5030
http://www.ti.com/lit/ds/symlink/lm5030.pdf
LM5037
**broken link removed**
LTC3721
http://cds.linear.com/docs/en/datasheet/37211fs.pdf
UCC3808
http://www.ti.com/lit/ds/symlink/ucc3808-2.pdf
UC3846
http://www.ti.com/lit/ds/symlink/uc3846.pdf
UCC3808, LM5030, LM5037 , UC3846, LTC3721-1
None of these chips has output overload protection. By “output overload protection”, I mean that if the error amplifer internal to them is railed high for more than 1 second, then these chips do *not* latch off.
Most offline flyback smps chips have this facility, so why do none of the full-bridge smps chips have this?
LM5030
http://www.ti.com/lit/ds/symlink/lm5030.pdf
LM5037
**broken link removed**
LTC3721
http://cds.linear.com/docs/en/datasheet/37211fs.pdf
UCC3808
http://www.ti.com/lit/ds/symlink/ucc3808-2.pdf
UC3846
http://www.ti.com/lit/ds/symlink/uc3846.pdf