Continue to Site

Welcome to EDAboard.com

Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

[SOLVED] Questions Concerning Radiation Boundary in HFSS

Status
Not open for further replies.

Xionarc

Newbie level 5
Joined
Nov 9, 2014
Messages
8
Helped
0
Reputation
0
Reaction score
0
Trophy points
1
Activity points
94
Hi

I have a question about the Radiation Boundary in HFSS itself. I am simulating a dipole with a lumped port feed and I notice changes in the resonant impedance/frequency when I change the size of the Radiation Boundary. According to the design requirements, I gathered that the minimum distance of the radiation boundary away from the radiating structure should be lambda/4.

I modeled my dipole for IR wavelengths, it's 5um in length (including the feed gap) and for the lambda/4 design I get a resonant frequency of 25.05THz. Whereas when I increase the radiation boundary to around twice more (in height, length and width) I get a resonant frequency of 24.7THz. Although the difference is small why is there a difference at all if both case abide by the lambda/4 rule? It feels like the first case has a sort of cavity mode associated with it or something.

Does anyone have a solution to determine the right medium dimensions for accurate resonant results?

Thanks in advance
 

Attachments

  • lambdaby4 abidance Setup.png
    lambdaby4 abidance Setup.png
    110.6 KB · Views: 102
  • lambdaby4 abidance.png
    lambdaby4 abidance.png
    40.4 KB · Views: 64

The radiation boundary may not be appropriately meshed. Try applying a relatively fine seed mesh to it.

Thank you! I did apply an Element Length Based Mesh Refinement with a restriction to maximum length of elements = 0.5um and now for any size of Radiation Boundary, it gives you the same resonant frequency. Although for larger radiation boundary sizes, the processing time is way longer. Thanks once again!
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top