Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.
Hi iyami
Thank you for your enthusiasm.
The problem is that the left and bottom boundaries are not absorbing but reflecting. What I want is all four boundaries absorbing.
The first plot shows that the left and bottom boundaries are reflecting (can be seen from the irregular circules). The...
I used a different scheme, but the same ABC. So in the above program, I calculated H and then E. To plot the 'correct' plot, I manually eleminated the H part and use only E field, then discretize it and program it. However, I use exactly the same ABC and no matter where I put the source, the...
Dear Milind,
Thank you for your reply.
My goal is to have all four boundaries absoring the wave, regardless of the source position.
If the boundary conditions are correct, then why it is a problem of the source position?
If I want to achieve my goal, should I do any modifications?
Just as a...
Hi Milind,
Thank you very much for your reply.
Actually I was thinking to email you directly but afraid to bother you so I just post this.
I know the code can be run, but the only problem is that on the left and bottom boundaries it is not absorbing.
My goal is to have the all four boundaries...
Dear all,
I was working with the Mur's first order and second order ABCs for the 2D FDTD programming.
There is a very strange problem happening right now.
For BOTH the first order AND the second order Mur's ABC in my code, they only work for the upper and right boundaries, not for the top and...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
