Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.
When you simulate modes in a floquet port, HFSS returns every possible result. Meaning if somehow your device takes TE and turns it into a TM mode, HFSS will account for that in the results.
If your device only functions with a TE mode and the result is a TE mode you would only see a response in...
That's because the waveguide excitation calculates the modes for a rectangular waveguide with those LxW and dielectric constant of the medium. As long as the mode's cut off is below the cutoff of your waveguide it WILL propagate.
Re: great difference between the simulation results of HFSS&
I believe you HFSS design differs from the CST MWS.
Somethings I noticed.
1.You have no boundaries for HFSS
2.Wave port excitation into vacuum with no conducting boundaries in HFSS
3.You are essential exciting a mode into a vacuum...
4 bit comparator
Hello,
I'm having a hard time making a 4-bit comparator in multisim. I am trying to make a equal or greater than module. Does anyone have any sample schematics or actual 4-bit comparator for multisim that they can show me?
Thank you for your help!
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
