Continue to Site

Welcome to EDAboard.com

Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

Recent content by tantoun2004

  1. T

    Matlab problem with using the "solve" function for Algebraic equations

    Re: Matlab problem Hi, I think that the error you get is due to that you didn't install the symbolic math toolbox or the extended math toolbox. This i ssolved nby installing them from the MatLab source. Hope this helps,
  2. T

    linear algebra question

    If your 8 by 8 matrix has rank =8 then all its columns are the basis but if the rank is less, some columns are dependent and do not form a basis. For example if u put a column and then u multiply by 2,3 4,... all columns are dependent and u get one basis vector. Best wishes,
  3. T

    Please check my math functions

    Re: just check Well, answer to these integrations are: 1)(x^2)/2 +c 2)(x^1.25)/1.25 +c 3)-cos(x)+c Regards,
  4. T

    relation between beta and gama function help me

    the relation between beta and gama function Hi, Check this site you'll find the answer. https://mathworld.wolfram.com/BetaFunction.html Best wishes,
  5. T

    need advise on waveguides

    Hi, You could also try "Microwave devices and circuits" by Samuel Liao. Regards,
  6. T

    how are laplace and fourier transforms related?

    Dear electronics_kumar, When u get Laplace Transform of a fn as a function in s , You can substitute s=sigma + j*omega. and then plot this as a function of both sigma and omega which is shown as the surface on the RHS. If you put sigma =0 (cutting the surface by a plane) I get Fourier Transform...
  7. T

    how are laplace and fourier transforms related?

    Hi, To visualise that look at the attached figure, the RHS is Laplace transform , by putting sigma = 0; we will get Fourier transform. Regards,
  8. T

    Physical challenge question about electrons

    Re: challenge question .. Hi Basil, What I meant by no sources is what u agreed with which is fields can exist by themselves with no need of 'continious' sources like the example of an oscillating electron but of course a source must have generated fields otherwise we would get energy from...
  9. T

    Looking for Life Science books

    Re: Life Science Books Hi, You can also check this site on which I found many of life science books: **broken link removed** Regards,
  10. T

    Solve the problem [hlp]

    Hi everyone, Just a quick note : The formula you put(cos(x)/(sqrt(1-sin^2(x)) can be simplified easily into 1 That's because y=arcsin(sin(x))=x and hence y' =1 Regards
  11. T

    Integrate cos(sin(x))

    integral sin catalan Hi, This is not correct because cos(cos(90-x) is not equal to cos^(90-x) whis is equal to cos(90-x)*cos(90-x). It can only be integrated numerically unless it has limits of 0 to pi where it's Bessel function.. Regards,
  12. T

    Physical challenge question about electrons

    Re: challenge question .. Hello everyone, I just have some points to say: *First an electron can radiate energy in the form of photons or electromagnetic waves if u want but also it can absorb photons as we know for an electron inside the atoms, and through all its life it keep like this...
  13. T

    Integrate cos(sin(x))

    integration sin(sin(x)) Hi, If this integral has limits of 0 to pi it will be equal to pi*J(0,x) where J(0,x) is Bessel function of order zero. Regards,
  14. T

    why certain quantities cannot have negative values?

    Hello, I am not sure but I think that we can imagine things which do not exist physically and talk about them. It's like when we talk about asin(3) we know that sin is between -1 and 1 but in complex plane we can get inverse sines greater than 1. Also I remember reading an essay on negative...
  15. T

    classical and quantum physics

    Hi, Well we can say that probability if the main difference between classical and quantum physics, other differences are based on the uncertainty based on the fact that everything is probablilistic (as we mentioned interference of probability waves which is called dual aspect...) But there is...

Part and Inventory Search

Back
Top