Continue to Site

Welcome to EDAboard.com

Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

Recent content by SilverFoil

  1. S

    RF combiner

    Makes sense, thanks.
  2. S

    RF combiner

    Alright, that looks like plenty to get my teeth into :). Thanks. One last question, if I may. I've seen it suggested that a op-amp in inverting summing configuration could be used as a active combiner. I haven't seen it in any literature, which implies it's a really stupid idea. Is this just...
  3. S

    RF combiner

    Dimly, yes I am aware. Thanks for checking, though. I'm given to understand that adding an amplifier after it would restore the gain but not the signal to noise ratio? Or is 'attenuation equals loss of noise figure' rule only for 'real' (resistive) loss?
  4. S

    RF combiner

    Alright, I'll look into that. Thanks.
  5. S

    RF combiner

    Alright, thanks for the advice. I have to say that I'm not confident I could design one from scratch and expect it to work properly with my current level of understanding. Don't suppose you'd know of a comprehensive theory document or simulation software or something like that?
  6. S

    RF combiner

    Aaaand I just realised that I forgot to mention that this is a PCB mounted circuit. The only 16 way splitter/combiners they make are connectorised. Also, by 'doing it yourself', do you mean cascaded ADP-2-1W+ that I mentioned in the original post? There's no weird gotcha for why that wouldn't...
  7. S

    RF combiner

    I'm trying to figure out the best way to get the vector sum of 16 different signals of different phases (and probably multiple frequencies as well). My primary concern is minimising changes to the signal phase, followed by noise figure and then gain. Is there a accepted way to do this? Either...

Part and Inventory Search

Back
Top