Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.
As you can see even in the picture you shared there are additional slowly decaying modes (degenerative modes) which always makes the simulations setup messy. I would suggest you to get rid of this problem and then try to proceed with the next steps. As per my experience if the ports support such...
I have run your simulation just by making the following changes
1. I removed the specific mesh definitions as from my point of view it was sort of over kill I mean 0.5 mm length and use the slider setting
2. Despite so tight mesh definition you did not enabled the "Apply curvilinear to all...
To be hones I am not able to understand what is written in equation as in TEM wave electric and magnetic fields propagate perpendicular to each other and both propagate perpendicular to the direction of wave and it is very easy to visualize as well
If you do not mind please share with me the HFSS file as it would be more easier and more time efficient for me to have a look at the model and understand if I understand the problem and can help you to resolve it. Based on my experience a simulation setup in proper way does not require insane...
If you want to plot the fields at all the frequency points which I would never recommend then you need to check the save fields tab in the left bottom corner of sweep setup but it will make the solution file huge and it works for all types interpolating, discrete and fast sweeps.
It means the optimization setup has reached to the conclusion that no better solution exist for the problem and you can solve this issue by either adding more variables to the optimization or changing the range of the variables in the optimizer and the 2nd thing you can do is increase the number...
Unfortunately there is no way to see which edges CST is referring to and that is not that important as well as all we need is to solve the issue. Sometimes this message just comes as warning and can be and should be ignored unless you are very much concerned about the accuracy of the simulation...
Please try to do the following
1. Define your plots in advance before running the simulation as sometimes HFSS updated the data after each run and it is pretty straightforward step.
2. Try to see which setup is being used when plotting as when you try to plot on the top left there is drop down...
From your description only one thing is clear that your simulation setup is not setup in a proper way and that is resulting in error can you share some pics of your simulation setup, your mesh definition and geometry. The problem has nothing to do with the mesh or computational resources rather...
Unfortunately there is no particle solve in HFSS or ANSYS for sue you can use CST and then introduce the particle of your choice and see anything you want but not in HFSS. CST has particle studio which offers TRK, PIC and WAKE solver for particle studies.
I am also not sure but I really doubt that such an option exists anyways. But you can configure default excitations in HFSS to force your mode of interest like by defining excitation vectors and by imposing certain boundary conditions as I am sure that you can excite your mode of interest using...
You can go with the default settings using wave port option of HFSS to get the complete S matrix for your system. As during the calculation of complete S matrix each port is treated as source as well as perfectly matched load to calculate all entries of S matrix
Hi
Problem statement:
I am working on a coupler design to couple a spherical cavity. My cavity is High Q and I need to over couple it by a factor of 7. So I need to fins loaded Q with HFSS to adjust my coupling.
For this I need to use PML but I do not know how to define PML properly.
I have...
If you have solved the complete model including pickups with Eigen Solver and you are getting one frequency which you are not able to get with driven model then there could be one of two possibilities
1. Model is not setup properly either in both or one of the solvers so make sure to have proper...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
