Continue to Site

Welcome to EDAboard.com

Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

Recent content by mohi@608

  1. M

    reset doubt in test cases ???

    hello , well i am writing test case for a particular ip ....and whenever iam configuring the register i have to reset the reg model .... Is it necessary to do that as in practical case user wont reset it every time he wishes to reconfigure ...
  2. M

    need help to understand this example ?????

    this is a simple example for a counter : // TLM counter // compiler: Visual C++ 2008 Express Edition // #include <stdio.h> #include <systemc.h> #include "tlm.h" #include "tlm_utils/simple_initiator_socket.h" #include "tlm_utils/simple_target_socket.h" using namespace tlm; using namespace...
  3. M

    memory maped bus ???

    Hello , What does memory mapped buses means in general ....??? does any one have any idea ??? With Regard Mohit
  4. M

    systemC related query ????

    Hello all , I have a few questions related to systemC TLM : 1.Well if we are using sytemC TLM modelling do we still require primitive channel in systemC models or it would be simply handled by TLM sockets ???? 2.How should one decide whether there model is loosely timed or accurately timed ...
  5. M

    systemC related query ???

    Hello all , I have a few questions related to systemC TLM : 1.Well if we are using sytemC TLM modelling do we still require primitive channel in systemC models or it would be simply handled by TLM sockets ???? 2.How should one decide whether there model is loosely timed or accurately timed ...
  6. M

    systemC query related to LFSR???

    well i want an system C model of LFSR (or a randomizer)..... as in digital it consists of a few flip flops with a few feedback path... but in simple C++ it has a random(range) for it .... I am not whether result fron both the cases will be same or not as i am very new to systemC could any one...
  7. M

    generic design pro and cons ??

    could anybody help me why do we need parameters in generic design or is there any other way for generic design other then parameters ....... Any side effects of using parameters ..... I am only asking in terms of digital design ???
  8. M

    verilog basic question on aynsc reset ???

    well i want to have a async reset which is active high on a block which is operating at posedge of sys clock.. my code is as follows.......always@(posedge sys_clk or posedge reset) begin if(reset) ...... .,,, end( my doubt is can we use both sy_clk and reset at posedge in order to fullfill the...
  9. M

    sampler issues in USART???

    hello all, i wish to design a sampler without using a faster clock(like 16x,8x or 4x)....can that be possible because i have limitation in producing a faster clock..... Mohit Negi
  10. M

    basic verilog questions??

    A wish to design a module ...i have two methods one is writing the functionality of all sub components in same module(let the tool do all the work ) or making separate module for each sub component and calling it in the top module... which approach is better ???? i have another doubt can we...
  11. M

    verilog error in programming???

    module counter(input [31:0] baud_rate_req,input [31:0] sys_freq,input clk,input reset,output [31:0] count_out); reg [31:0] count_value; count_value =(sys_freq/baud_rate_reg); always@(posedge clk or negedge reset) begin if(reset==1) count_out=32'b0; else while(count_out<count_value)...
  12. M

    verilog basic question ???

    well the instantiation would be same for both the styles abc k1(a,b,c);
  13. M

    verilog basic question ???

    well which is better from synthesis point of view ??? and i feel second is better as it is reducing the no. of lines of codes...
  14. M

    verilog basic question ???

    i have a very simple ques on verilog basic module abc(a,b,c); input a; input [3:0]b; output [3:0]c; module abc(input a,input [3:0] b, output [3:0] c); which of the above coding style would be better ??
  15. M

    basic ques related to tlm and systemc

    hi, sorry i could reply earlier i was going through the systemc code and i have a doubt that why have you used this: const char* hdl_name() const { return "counter_module"; }

Part and Inventory Search

Back
Top