Continue to Site

Welcome to EDAboard.com

Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

Recent content by Joyee

  1. J

    System level verification

    Actually, I cannot agree with writng separate test case for testing each feature of DUT. By using Specman, you can represent features in coverage. Specman can help you direct the random beam to specific verification room. So, through checking coverage report, you can get to which feature is...
  2. J

    SystemC , Systemverilog , vera , specman...

    I just think E can survive in the future years since IEEE appears to be very headache about systemverilog and does not want to accept it as a new verilog standard. For systemverilog, cadence also doesn't plan to support such a mixed language(design and verification, two quite different tasks)...
  3. J

    Opinions on VCS 7.0 software

    Who can provide the link of scl for synopsys? The dameon is not shipped with VCS. Thanks in advance!
  4. J

    Specman e - practical programming tutorial needed

    Specman Hi: all who is using Specman e to construct the verification environment? The tutorial of specman is too simple to be used for a practical purpose. I wonder if anyone can provide any practical program in language e? Thanks! Joyee
  5. J

    Opinions on VCS 7.0 software

    syntax vcs However, who can provide the license for VCS 6.2? You've been warned
  6. J

    Need Synp!ify 7.2 linux license

    Yes, I do encounter this problem as well.. the waining messege is that the checkout license cannot authorize the platform of LINUX. How to fix it ? In addition, HDS of Mentor seems to have the same problem as that of Synplify. Anybody can offer any suggestion? Joyee
  7. J

    What is the best verification tool ?

    Yes, I do agree with you according to my knowledge from other companies who are using that tool. However, for me, I cannot procure that tool so far. Therefore, there is no way for me to have some try. Anybody can share it for free. So, we can have a better communication on it in future, right? I...
  8. J

    What is the best verification tool ?

    focs verification download Yes, maybe you are right. However, as far as the current situation is concerned, the price of specman is prohibitive. Therefore, test builder may be good alternative. However, I do have no idea about Transaction Navigator. I will hunt it later.
  9. J

    What is the best verification tool ?

    specman verification tool +downloadable I support testbuilder of Cadence. It's free of charge and the complete the extended class of C++.
  10. J

    What is the best verification tool ?

    testbuilder cadence download I support testbuilder of Cadence. It's free of charge and the complete the extended class of C++.
  11. J

    The timing mode of the core generated by Coregen of Xilinx

    xilinx coregen timing model As we know, if we instantiate the core generated by Core generator of Xilinx, the timing performance will improve dramatically. However, as our design including the hdl codes except the core of Coregen should be processed by synthesis tools, Synplify, and the tools...
  12. J

    Data Multiplexing using triStates?

    ok, I see. Thank you Armer
  13. J

    Data Multiplexing using triStates?

    I just try to implement my design by tri-state. If all mux can be implemented by LUTs and LUTs can play better performance than tri-state, why does Xilinx provide internal tri-state gates?
  14. J

    Data Multiplexing using triStates?

    As we know, data multiplexing is often applied and two main implementation methods are prevalent in FPGA of Xilinx, say Spartan. They are BUFT and the combination of MUX and LUT. However, in practice, some expericense informs us that BUFT is not recommended due to its simulation mismatch and...
  15. J

    PLI - designing a test bench in C

    Yes, I know. Did you try FPGA Advantage? I just want to compose the tester in C. And I will connect the tester and the UUT(Unit under Test). The whole entity should be called TEST BENCH, right? Therefore, I think your method is right. Thank you!!

Part and Inventory Search

Back
Top