Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.
Maybe, my observation was ambiguous... I only think that, in order to
define quantum postulates as "intuitive" and not only "workable", we need,
or better, our Minds need to completely rearrange all their circuits... and unfortunately it's a slow process...
It's like Galileo's revolutionary...
Maybe the real problem is due to the desperate effort
to "intuitively" understand results (such as mobility or effective mass)
that have been deduced by absolutely "non intuitive" quantum/mechanics postulates.
image from Pierret-advanced semiconductor foundamentals
Hi, i've the same problem in understanding how we can move from the Kroenig-Penny periodic-potential model to the simplified Sommerfeld model;
in particular i don't understand why the valence electrons are said to be strictly bounded (so...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
