Continue to Site

Welcome to EDAboard.com

Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

Assura extractor failure

Status
Not open for further replies.

gabi71ro

Junior Member level 2
Joined
Sep 3, 2003
Messages
21
Helped
0
Reputation
0
Reaction score
0
Trophy points
1,281
Location
Iasi Romania
Activity points
259
Hello All,

After I used many years Calibre and from time to time Dracula for layout parasitic extractions, now I have to do this with Assura.
I find few things that put me in a difficult position, and make to untrust Assura results. (Like a conffirmation that Assura don't work properly)
Description case 1:
I have two wide metals (metal 1 and metal 2), both with 0.12 Ohms resistace. This two metals are connected trough a 2x2 via 1 matrix. Supposing that Rvia1=5 Ohms, the resulted resistance of this matrix should be 1.25 Ohms. Now the total resistance of metal1 + via1 matrix + metal2 must be equal with:
0.12 + 1.25 + 0.12 = 1.49 Ohms.
Assura extractions show me a value about 20.24 Ohms, which suggest that Assura doesen't calculate paralell resistor values and it add like a serial resistor structure.
Description case 2:
in case of three short paralel metal lines (agressor-victim-agressor), with the same width, placed at minimum space, Assura calculate a total capacitance for the victim with the formula Ct=2cc + cba + 2cbf + cta + 2ctf = 1 fF (cc= coupled or lateral cap, cba =area cap to bottom layer, cbf = fringe capto bottom, cta = area cap to top layer, ctf = fringe cap to top layer).
If I increase only the space between lines (double space), the total capacitancies increase!!! for short lines.
I am agree that increasing the space, a part of cc will be transformed in cbf and ctf, but both cbf and ctf have let say a small contribution in the Ct. On the other hand, with a hand calculation, the second value (for double space) is smaller than the first one, normal I say.
In case of long lines, Assura extract show me Ct(single space) < Ct (double space) but the difference is too small. (comparing with the hand calculation).

Do you know why Assura give me these results?
Is an Assura bug, or a mistake in the rule file?
It is possible that all this to come from Vampire?
But Vampire have nothing to do with paralell resistors.....

Can I trust Assura? (no hard feelings for Cadence's engineers)

Best Regards,
Gabriel.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top