Continue to Site

Welcome to EDAboard.com

Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

Array Antenna sizing by number of elements

Status
Not open for further replies.

robb-flynn

Newbie
Joined
Feb 11, 2014
Messages
4
Helped
0
Reputation
0
Reaction score
0
Trophy points
1,281
Location
Naples, Italy, Italy
Activity points
1,351
Hi,

I should answer the following question:

A square array at 10 GHz needs 40 dB gain out to ±60° in both planes. The internal loss is 3 dB and SWR limit 3:1. The beam broadening factor is 1.2. How many elements are needed?
The instantaneous bandwidth is 10%. What is the minimum number of time delay devices that the array needs to only suffer a 3 dB loss at band edges?
.

Can anyone help me? In the hypothesis of considering a square array with half-wavelength spacing, I used the empirical formula "D0=32400cos(theta0)/(theta_x * theta_y)" (used, in turn, in the gain expression), but the number of elements that came out is just 3 :-(, thus suggesting the array would be 3x3, which I think is too small for 40dB of gain.

Thanks in advance.
 

Welcome robb-flynn,

I don't think you've provided enough information. What is the gain and 3dB beamwidth of each element? etc.
 

Hi,

I should answer the following question:

A square array at 10 GHz needs 40 dB gain out to ±60° in both planes. The internal loss is 3 dB and SWR limit 3:1. The beam broadening factor is 1.2. How many elements are needed?
The instantaneous bandwidth is 10%. What is the minimum number of time delay devices that the array needs to only suffer a 3 dB loss at band edges?
.

Can anyone help me? In the hypothesis of considering a square array with half-wavelength spacing, I used the empirical formula "D0=32400cos(theta0)/(theta_x * theta_y)" (used, in turn, in the gain expression), but the number of elements that came out is just 3 :-(, thus suggesting the array would be 3x3, which I think is too small for 40dB of gain.

Thanks in advance.

Hint: Use the Directivity Aperture equation projected at 60degrees
[D=cos(60)×4ΠA/(λ²)] reduce by 3dB loss=1/2 and fill Aperture with elements spaced at halfwave intervals.
 

I think you are mixing formulas for beamwidth with formul for gain. what (but I have ti chekc) that seems impossible is the 40dB gain over so wide angular range (probalby unfeasible). Wdie beam implies samll array high gain big array..
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top