Continue to Site

Welcome to EDAboard.com

Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

Latch-up effect and parasitic transistors

Status
Not open for further replies.

harry456

Member level 1
Joined
Nov 13, 2012
Messages
39
Helped
0
Reputation
0
Reaction score
0
Trophy points
1,286
Activity points
1,545
Most explanation explain the latchup effect with out Drain Transistors of the CMOS (LT2 & VT2) why are the negligible?

capture001.PNG
**broken link removed**
 

I think LT2 & VT2 are equally relevant for latchup as LT1 & VT1 are (actually more relevant as they are closer, and so their collector-to-base series resistance in substrate should be lower).

But for the latchup explanation, the connection between (any) two such transistors is sufficient, I guess.
 

In the cartoon as drawn, the closer-coupled PNP and NPN
will determine the latchup onset owing to their lowest
series resistance to each other and their highest shunt
resistance to the "taps" (ties). After the first 4-layer
device fires, you are done. This is where "negligible"
comes from.

Now this cartoon represents some worst layout practices
(in respect to latchup suppression). But in the commercial
arena you concern yourself with "good enough" and moving
in a timely way to the next problem. If shoddy is good
enough then shoddy will probably be what is done.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

Part and Inventory Search

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top