Continue to Site

Welcome to EDAboard.com

Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

Register Log in

Simple broadband mixer without transformers.

Status
Not open for further replies.
neazoi

neazoi

Advanced Member level 6
Joined
Jan 5, 2008
Messages
4,122
Helped
13
Reputation
26
Reaction score
15
Trophy points
1,318
Location
Greece
Activity points
36,951
Hello, I would like to construct a mixer for LF-HF without transformers and I have found this circuit.
Can I remove the coil (which is coupled to the next stage coil) and connect a capacitor to extract the IF?
A sharp crystal filter will follow this capacitor.
Any comments are welcome.
 

Attachments

  • Untitled.png
    Untitled.png
    405.9 KB · Views: 65

That might work, but what's wrong with the numerous active mixer ICs based on the gilbert cell mixer?
 

Gilbert cell mixers can be made/bought without transformers. They provide the mixing by controlling the current/gain of one signal path with the voltage from another. With care you can use a good Gilbert cell mixer from almost DC up to several GHZ. They may not be optimal at any frequency but they work at all.

Brian.
 

betwixt said:
Gilbert cell mixers can be made/bought without transformers. They provide the mixing by controlling the current/gain of one signal path with the voltage from another. With care you can use a good Gilbert cell mixer from almost DC up to several GHZ. They may not be optimal at any frequency but they work at all.

Brian.
Click to expand...

So will designs like this **broken link removed** expected to work much better than the single dual gate mosfer (or composite dual mosfet)?

- - - Updated - - -

By looking closely at the gilbert cell, it is a double balanced mixer, so I should expect better performance than the figure of post #1 (Local oscillator should appear very attenuated at the output).
Am I right?
 

You are right.
What a wonderful link that is, it's great to see someone experimenting and explaining in such simple terms. I wish I could understand Japanese but the translation makes perfect sense.

Brian.
 
  • Like
Reactions: neazoi

    neazoi

    neazoi

    Points: 2
    Helpful Answer Positive Rating
Why don't you use dual gate MOS ??They are still used to mix. the signals well..
 

BigBoss said:
Why don't you use dual gate MOS ??They are still used to mix. the signals well..
Click to expand...
It is not the active device used but the topology that makes the difference. The gilbert cell mixers in the japanese link are doubly ballanced mixers, meaning that the carrier is attenuated at the output.
The author provides a fet version at the end too, but what is the reason of using these usually more expensive fets. (besides the creater number of trimmers used)
 

Yes, a BF998 would probably work well as a very simple single balanced mixer. If you have some matched pair transistors lying around then making your own gilbert cell would work well too.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

Part and Inventory Search

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top