Continue to Site

Welcome to EDAboard.com

Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

Noise simulation mismatch from KT/C by fingering the transistor

Status
Not open for further replies.

ahmad.mar

Newbie level 6
Joined
Nov 9, 2011
Messages
12
Helped
0
Reputation
0
Reaction score
0
Trophy points
1,281
Location
Germany
Activity points
1,378
Hello IC experts,

has anybody before noticed a problem in the transistor thermal noise model as below;

I am simulating ac noise and transient noise for a simple RC circuit, but with the R replaced by a closed (nmos) switch

I am comparing different switches which are vectored, multiplied or fingered nmos, but all have the same W/L total

when transistor is fingered, the resulting noise is up to 2x smaller than KT/C.
for the others, the noise is pretty much KT/C.

my doubt: I would expect gate noise and thus MORE noise than KT/C, but definitely not less!

has anybody experience such a behavior or do you have a reasonable explanation for this problem

BR
Ahmad
 
Last edited:

... when transistor is fingered, the resulting noise is up to 2x smaller than KT/C. for the others, the noise is pretty much KT/C...

In smaller node sizes, thermal gate noise voltage may add a not insignificant contribution to the total thermal noise. The main culprit for this contribution is gate series resistance, and this is much less for fingered transistors than with other configurations.

See also this post.
 

what you mentioned is true and meaningful, but as I mentioned; my doubt is due to having a noise level below kT/C model, which (kT/C) would be the noise due to the channel resistance only even without the added effect from the gate series resistance!
 

... having a noise level below kT/C model, which (kT/C) would be the noise due to the channel resistance only even without the added effect from the gate series resistance!

This actually isn't easy to be understood. Could the channel resistance calculation be wrong? Any parallel resistances, capacitance short circuits?
 

Could the channel resistance calculation be wrong? Any parallel resistances, capacitance short circuits?
the current setup is made very simple to avoid such things, it is basically just a fully on nmos: gate at vdd=1.1, source at some Vdc=0-0.3, drain connected to the capacitor.
The noise power is calculated at the drain.
 

nmos: gate at vdd=1.1, source at some Vdc=0-0.3, drain connected to the capacitor.
The noise power is calculated at the drain.

Where does the drain current flow from? Pls. provide a full schematic!
 

Ok, thank you. Which C did you use in your calculation? Is it possible that there are more (parallel) capacitances which you didn't consider? Built-in and parasitic ones?
 

Is it possible that there are more (parallel) capacitances which you didn't consider? Built-in and parasitic ones?
I think that is not possible, I checked different capacitor sizes (100f - 20pf), and that -wrong- effect seems to scale with the cap size
 

There may be something to do with how the "fingering"
is done. A MOSFET with W*m*L area might (I suppose)
give a different noise analysis result than (m) W*L MOSFETs
in parallel.

But I also think you may be putting too much weight on
the ideal expression when there are multiple noise actors
and nowhere in that expression do aspects such as gate
resistance appear.

To the point about unexpressed or wrong capacitances,
the sharing of S / D regions in a fingered device will make
some of those smaller than an equivalent width single stripe
device. Whether this is faithfully represented by your subcircuit
and model chain, is an exercise.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top