Continue to Site

Welcome to EDAboard.com

Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

Issues with PML and Varying Angle of Incidence in HFSS

Status
Not open for further replies.

Chesskitty

Newbie level 1
Joined
Apr 24, 2012
Messages
1
Helped
0
Reputation
0
Reaction score
0
Trophy points
1,281
Activity points
1,296
Hello,

I want to model a periodic unit cell in HFSS with a plane wave excitation in the XZ plane with varying angles of incidence. I have started by modeling an air box (20mm x 20mm x 187mm) with PML boundaries on the +/- z sides of the box and Master/Slave boundaries on the other sides. For the top and bottom faces (+/- y), I set the phase delay to 0. For the +/- x faces, I set the phase delay as a function of frequency: (2pi*freq*a/c)*cos(theta), where a is the x length of the box, c is the speed of light and theta is the angle of incidence measured from +x to -x. For the plane wave, I use k = (cos(theta), 0, sin(theta)) and E0 = (sin(theta), 0, -cos(theta)). I run the parametric study with theta = 0, 45, 90, 135, 180 deg for 3GHz. The unit cell would be observed between 8 and 10GHz.

The simulations complete, but the resulting fields are not as expected. It appears that k and S are parallel, but E0 and the E field are not in the same direction, and H is not as it should be. For theta=0, k starts along +x and E0 starts along -z, but after the run E is along +z and H is along -y. The values are also not constant along x, but are constant along z. The same goes for theta=180; k starts along -x and E0 starts along +z, but after the run E is along -z and H is along -y. For theta=90, E is sinusoidal in the XZ plane, H is sinusoidal in the YZ plane and P-vectors are along +z. All three increase in magnitude along +z.

Any ideas as to what might be going wrong here? For a simple box of air, I would expect uniform fields in the directions of excitation. Please help!

Many thanks!!
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top