T
treez
Guest
Hello,
This product does not have the regulatory 8mm of isolation spacing from the mains side to the LED side....
....At time 20:52 of the following, appears to be the proof that this mains light bulb not isolated....
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YLlpoZaBx-g
Therefore, is it ok if i do a 15W flyback with bifilar wound enamelled copper wire (not triple insulated copper wire).
In a typical offline flyback, the 3500VAC regulatory isolation spec means that the transformer has a high leakage term, and 10% of the circuit losses are due to the leakage inductance.....if we can bifilar wind with enamelled copper wire then the leakage will be far less, and so too will be the circuit losses.
Will a bifilar wound, 1:1 flyback transformer, have the lowest leakage possible for a flyback transformer?
This product does not have the regulatory 8mm of isolation spacing from the mains side to the LED side....
....At time 20:52 of the following, appears to be the proof that this mains light bulb not isolated....
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YLlpoZaBx-g
Therefore, is it ok if i do a 15W flyback with bifilar wound enamelled copper wire (not triple insulated copper wire).
In a typical offline flyback, the 3500VAC regulatory isolation spec means that the transformer has a high leakage term, and 10% of the circuit losses are due to the leakage inductance.....if we can bifilar wind with enamelled copper wire then the leakage will be far less, and so too will be the circuit losses.
Will a bifilar wound, 1:1 flyback transformer, have the lowest leakage possible for a flyback transformer?
