Continue to Site

Welcome to EDAboard.com

Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

Register Log in

codevision or AVR studio or IAR

Status
Not open for further replies.
A

Amin Khorsandi

Member level 2
Joined
Oct 12, 2013
Messages
45
Helped
5
Reputation
10
Reaction score
5
Trophy points
8
Activity points
293
hello every one
I use codevision for my programs and I'm new in Xmega micro controllers. I want to learn Xmega but I don't know which software should I choose.could someone tell me which one is better now. what are the advantages and disadvantages of each one?
codevision
AVR studio
IAR
:!:
 

I've never heard about it. mikroC pro avr ??? what are the advantages?
 

Go to mikroe.com and download demo version of mirkoC/Basic/Pascal PRO AVR Compiler and try it. They have a lot of libraries but code is not disclosed.
 

is there any open source compiler for AVR
 

WinAVR software..

Keil tools By ARM..
 

My experience:

IAR - Best choice in all ways for professional purpose.
CodeVisionAVR - Very nice compiler. Generate good machine code without serious faults in compiling and linking, nice IDE, easy to use. I usually use CVAVR in combination with AVR Studio for debuging.
WinAVR - Good, but as all free projects always unfinshed.

I don't prefere work with too much compilers for same CPU core, but I had chance to work with these in several relative complex projects.
 

I think any compiler we use but main goal is easy to read , write, modified our code and simulate using Proteus to get desired result right.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

Part and Inventory Search

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top