Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.
i would start by simulating two known designs. classical patch antenna and circular polarized 4 elements patch antenna. Do simulation, see fields and exitation in 2d and 3d, then try to find out how they differ, compare it to theoretical difficult to understand things then know the truth about how to do it in reality
i would start by simulating two known designs. classical patch antenna and circular polarized 4 elements patch antenna. Do simulation, see fields and exitation in 2d and 3d, then try to find out how they differ, compare it to theoretical difficult to understand things then know the truth about how to do it in reality
10 x Terminator3 for your answer,
I've done this before, to make difference between circular and linear polarization we can use the Axial Ratio, ARCP-> 1 means a good circular polarization and vice versa but the problem is that sometimes I can't explain and understand the curve of the axial ratio sometimes I think that I have 3 types of polarization in the same curve hhh https://www.edaboard.com/threads/292081/
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
