+ Post New Thread
Results 21 to 29 of 29

31st August 2012, 18:32 #21
 Join Date
 May 2008
 Location
 Germany
 Posts
 5,658
 Helped
 1697 / 1697
 Points
 39,414
 Level
 48
Re: Questions about colpitts oscillator design?
Hi samy,
I suppose you are aware that you make use of the configuration in Fig. 2.18A .

31st August 2012, 18:32

31st August 2012, 18:47 #22
 Join Date
 Jan 2008
 Location
 Bochum, Germany
 Posts
 40,534
 Helped
 12391 / 12391
 Points
 234,575
 Level
 100
Re: Questions about colpitts oscillator design?
RE(total) = RE + re = 1500+26 = 1526 ohm
RB = R2//R4//(beta*[re+RE])= 14.5 kohm.
 output impedance of common collector circuit (for shorted input), you call it RE(total), is RE  re ≈ re
 beta at 148 MHz isn't equal betaDC. According to fT of 300 MHz, it's only about 2. The problem has been addressed in post #7.
 amplifier input and output impedance, load and source resistance are strongly mutually dependent in the CC circuit. That's a reason, why "impedance matching" doesn't achieve results representative for the circuit operation. Analyzing the circuit as CB with virtual ground, as suggested by LvW, gives a better decoupling of both amplifier ports.
Impedance matching isn't a bad design idea, when the amplifier power gain is small and must be well utilized to get the oscillator working at all. But it must consider the actual frequency dependent transistor parameters.
At frequencies with a sufficient gain margin, impedance matching isn't the right concept to design an oscillator feedback path.

1st September 2012, 00:00 #23
 Join Date
 May 2010
 Location
 Palestine
 Posts
 207
 Helped
 0 / 0
 Points
 1,858
 Level
 10
Re: Questions about colpitts oscillator design?
yes I Know, thanks
   Updated   
Yes, you're right
 beta at 148 MHz isn't equal betaDC. According to fT of 300 MHz, it's only about 2. The problem has been addressed in post #7.
 amplifier input and output impedance, load and source resistance are strongly mutually dependent in the CC circuit. That's a reason, why "impedance matching" doesn't achieve results representative for the circuit operation. Analyzing the circuit as CB with virtual ground, as suggested by LvW, gives a better decoupling of both amplifier ports.
explain I will try it.
Impedance matching isn't a bad design idea, when the amplifier power gain is small and must be well utilized to get the oscillator working at all. But it must consider the actual frequency dependent transistor parameters.
At frequencies with a sufficient gain margin, impedance matching isn't the right concept to design an oscillator feedback path.
On the whole, I feel very frustrated, but I'm going to resist
I guess there's certainly a not complicated solution
I will leave the next step to you
Thank you for your cooperation

1st September 2012, 00:00

1st September 2012, 03:33 #24
 Join Date
 Apr 2011
 Location
 Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
 Posts
 11,446
 Helped
 2250 / 2250
 Points
 45,875
 Level
 52
Re: Questions about colpitts oscillator design?
I guess there's certainly a not complicated solution
I will leave the next step to you
Formulas can only take us so far.
Of course the reality came first. Later came the math.
As for the concepts of operation, these are not so easy to grasp.
Simulations have become extremely useful in this area.
For an aid to understanding the operation of these LC tank oscillators, I suggest you watch my Youtube videos which show an animation of Colpitts and Clapp oscillators.
It graphically portrays current flowing through wires.
Also changing coil flux and emf.
Also capacitors charging and discharging.
Colpitts type:
http://youtu.be/mnlIifVnHSU
Clapp type (You will find your configuration resembles the last half of the video):
http://youtu.be/wKnarrvynIw

1st September 2012, 03:33

1st September 2012, 10:18 #25
 Join Date
 May 2008
 Location
 Germany
 Posts
 5,658
 Helped
 1697 / 1697
 Points
 39,414
 Level
 48
Re: Questions about colpitts oscillator design?
It's a pity that samy uses symbols without sufficient explanation, but I think he didn't make any error as far as RE is concerned (but I am surprised about his comment "yes, you are right").
According to his calculation I suppose the symbol "RB" stands for the resulting DYNAMIC input resistance of the whole amplifier stage and the symbol "RE(total)=RE+re" is just an intermediate step for the sum of two resistances.
After multiplication of this "fictive" value RE(total) with beta we arrive at the DYNAMIC input resistance looking into the base r_base.
Thus, with h21=beta and h11=common emitter short circuit input resistance we get:
r_base=h11 + h21*RE = h21*(h11/h21 + RE)=h21*(re+RE) with re=1/g=internal emitter resistance and g=transconductance.
Remark: This calculation did not yet consider the frequencyselective feedback path connected to the emitter as well as the load resistor (500 ohms).
Recommendation to samy:
1.) Please explain all calculations and symbols in order to avoid misunderstandings (wasting of time).
2.) Distinguish between static/ohmic resistors (large symbols R) and dynamic resistances (small symbols r).
   Updated   
Supplementing my explanations in post#17 I should mention that in CC configuration also the collector node must be considered as dynamically (ac) grounded.
(That means: Also this node has to be released from ground potential for transforming the CC in an equivalent CB configuration)Last edited by LvW; 1st September 2012 at 12:37.

2nd September 2012, 19:47 #26
 Join Date
 May 2010
 Location
 Palestine
 Posts
 207
 Helped
 0 / 0
 Points
 1,858
 Level
 10
Re: Questions about colpitts oscillator design?
First, thank you for Videos
The most beautiful I heard your voice
Now: The last words I have to say here I am convinced that the design is done by simulation.
Thank you all
You gave everything you can to help me
I appreciate it
   Updated   
I will do my best in the following discussions that take these tips into consideration
Thank you for your help

2nd September 2012, 21:44 #27
 Join Date
 Jan 2008
 Location
 Bochum, Germany
 Posts
 40,534
 Helped
 12391 / 12391
 Points
 234,575
 Level
 100
Re: Questions about colpitts oscillator design?
I'm somewhat surprized, that the circuit under discussion has been repeatedly associated with the clapp oscillator topology.
It's true, that the original circuit also covers the clapp oscillator option by making C0 small and constituating a series LC resonantor. But it has been clarified from the start that C0 is sufficient large to act as a DC block only.
Functionally, series resonant clapp and parallel resonant colpitts circuit are sufficiently different to distinguish them in the discussion. The exact analysis of the colpitts circuit is already demanding enough.

2nd September 2012, 23:41 #28
 Join Date
 Apr 2011
 Location
 Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
 Posts
 11,446
 Helped
 2250 / 2250
 Points
 45,875
 Level
 52
Re: Questions about colpitts oscillator design?
Yes, the capacitor next to the coil is large compared to the other 2 caps. It has little influence on the tank resonant frequency.
However it must charge up initially before oscillations get underway. Since it is a large uF value, this takes substantial time. The circuit can easily stagnate. It is not guaranteed to start oscillating.
So it should probably be reduced. Perhaps to the point where it will influence resonant frequency.
I'm somewhat surprized, that the circuit under discussion has been repeatedly associated with the clapp oscillator topology.
I am acquainted with this oscillator. It is discussed in articles about the NorCal radio transceiver. (A welldesigned unit which became popular due to its reliability and functionality.)
The screenshot below is from an article about the oscillator used. It calls it a Clapp type, a cousin of the Colpitts.
Subsequent pages show math calculations. I see a formula for resonant frequency. It includes all three capacitors. This implies the one next to the inductor is small enough to have an influence along with the other capacitors.
http://whites.sdsmt.edu/classes/ee32...2Lecture24.pdf
   Updated   

2nd September 2012, 23:41

3rd September 2012, 08:39 #29
 Join Date
 Jan 2008
 Location
 Bochum, Germany
 Posts
 40,534
 Helped
 12391 / 12391
 Points
 234,575
 Level
 100
Re: Questions about colpitts oscillator design?
I agree to the visual presentation of the clapp and colpitts relation. A C0 value of 1 nF as chosen in the begin of this thread is apart from having noticeable influence on the oscillation frequency but doesn't cause problems in simulation.
In the real circuit, a large coupling capacitor won't prevent oscillation, it's a pure simulation issue (as long as we consider linear oscillators).
+ Post New Thread
Please login