+ Post New Thread

Results 1 to 4 of 4

- 4th March 2012, 20:23 #1

- Join Date
- Jul 2009
- Posts
- 44
- Helped
- 1 / 1
- Points
- 644
- Level
- 5

## Scaling of IIR filter coefficients for Fixed-Point FPGA implementation of filter

I've designed a biquad IIR filter, and I would like to quantize the filter coefficients so that the difference equation can be used in a fixed-point FPGA code written in Verilog. The filter input ranges between 0 and ((2^12) -1) fixed-point values. The difference equation is Direct Form I (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_biquad_filter), and consists of additions, subtractions, and weighting values (coefficients).

The filter coefficients have been designed in Matlab as floating point values. How do I convert these floating point values to fixed-point that can be used in the Verilog code? Here is an example of the SOS matrix (http://www.mathworks.com/help/toolbo...ef/sos2tf.html) with the filter coefficients.

Code:1.0000 2.0302 1.0305 1.0000 -1.7596 0.7749 1.0000 2.0002 1.0005 1.0000 -1.8143 0.8301 1.0000 1.9696 0.9700 1.0000 -1.9175 0.9343

Code:a = 1.0000 -5.4914 12.5848 -15.4051 10.6225 -3.9118 0.6010 b = 1.0000 6.0000 15.0000 20.0000 15.0000 6.0000 1.0000

- 4th March 2012, 20:23

- 4th March 2012, 21:06 #2

- Join Date
- Aug 2011
- Posts
- 94
- Helped
- 23 / 23
- Points
- 690
- Level
- 5

## Re: Scaling of IIR filter coefficients for Fixed-Point FPGA implementation of filter

Converting float to fixed is fairly well known process. Some time on google will help.

But FDATool will do this for you :) Probably will save you some time (though you won't learn how to do it).

- 4th March 2012, 21:06

- 4th March 2012, 21:19 #3

- Join Date
- Jul 2010
- Posts
- 923
- Helped
- 294 / 294
- Points
- 5,700
- Level
- 17

## Re: Scaling of IIR filter coefficients for Fixed-Point FPGA implementation of filter

first, look at the spread of the values. Its around 6b for the integer portion (20 to -15). If you want 10b of fractional precision, then you have round((2**10) * k) for each of the values. This will give you a 16b value, where 1.0 = 1024 Keep in mind that "round" must be done carefully, as the implementation may result in the quantized coefficients giving an undesirable or even unstable impulse response. It is possible that you will need to round a 1.3 up to 2.0, or a 2.9 down to 2.0. Likewise, you might find that you'll want more fractional bits in order to allow the poles to be placed closer to the desired locations. In the hardware, you might have 12x16 multiplications. After the multiplication, you will need to (eventually) round the value by removing the lower bits. eg, a multiply by 1 would be x * 1024. the result would be 28b, and the lower 10b would be removed. This doesn't need to occur immediately though. you might have a 12x16 multiply (28b) followed by a 16b multiply (34b -- 20 fractional bits at this point). Eventually, you'll need to remove some fractional bits, as this is a recursive system.

1 members found this post helpful.

- 4th March 2012, 21:19

- 5th March 2012, 01:33 #4

- Join Date
- Jul 2009
- Posts
- 44
- Helped
- 1 / 1
- Points
- 644
- Level
- 5

## Re: Scaling of IIR filter coefficients for Fixed-Point FPGA implementation of filter

Thanks, permute; this is exactly what I was looking for.

+ Post New Thread

Please login