Continue to Site

Welcome to EDAboard.com

Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

Lowest jitter relaxation oscillator

Status
Not open for further replies.

thatsthebadger

Newbie level 4
Joined
Mar 25, 2011
Messages
7
Helped
0
Reputation
0
Reaction score
0
Trophy points
1,281
Activity points
1,337
Hi all, first post here - hope you might be able to help!

I need to design a 10MHz board level oscillator which has a 1/C frequency dependence (i.e. the 'C' will vary). I'm thinking that a relaxation oscillator would do the trick as its output f is proportional to 1/RC. However, the most important performance spec for this application is the output jitter, and I'm wondering a) whether a relaxation oscillator is 'good' for jitter and b) what would be the lowest jitter implementation if it was? I'm thinking perhaps a really fast comparator would be best, but then maybe a low noise, high frequency opamp might also be good? The output will be going into the inputs of a phase detector, and to confirm this is a PCB design with off the shelf parts.

Any suggestions?
 

The lower your edge rate, the greater the multiplication of
voltage-domain noise to time-domain noise. The comparator
itself wants to be fast and have a very narrow linear input
window (i.e. fast at low overdrive). But nonetheless, look
at what P-P noise amplitude you can get on the timing ramp
and how long the ramp dV/dt takes to pull through that
span, and there's your dt (jitter) P-P. Assuming everything
else in the lineup contributes none at all.

A higher frequency oscillator and digital division will lessen
the jitter a fair bit. But getting past 100MHz with glue
logic may be a stretch. At least with anything that doesn't
burn a whole mess of power.
 

Yes that makes perfect sense. I wonder how a simple schmit trigger oscillator compares but I guess it must be worse since your thresholds there will have pretty poor power supply rejection compared to the differential input of a comparator.

So make it run as fast as possible and divide it down - but what's the effect of the dividers, assuming one uses D types?

How about ditch the relaxation approach and go for a Wien or phase shift 'analogue' oscillator? I suppose that may be bad news as if you want it to drive logic then you are doing a pretty horrible multiplication of the slow voltage noise slopes into time domain jitter..?
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

Part and Inventory Search

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top