Continue to Site

Welcome to EDAboard.com

Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

Register Log in

Post simulation using Assura extraction Vs Calibre extraction

Status
Not open for further replies.
W

wccheng

Full Member level 5
Joined
May 16, 2004
Messages
287
Helped
1
Reputation
2
Reaction score
0
Trophy points
1,296
Activity points
2,710
Dear all,

I design a simple LNA now. I have tried to use Assura and Calibre to do RC extraction. However, I find the post simulation result is quite large different in two extraction view. My LNA is working at 3GHz around.For the Assura RC extraction, the post layout simulation result gives LNA wokring at 2.9GHz. If the Calibre RC extraction was used in the post layout simulation, it gave 2.8GHz working frequency. It shifts much more compared with Assura extraction. Now, which extraction I should believe?

Thanks
 

Calibre extraction more accurate regarding to my experiences.But it totally depends on the technology that you would use.
Because extraction rules are defined by your tech. file and it is dependent on its accuracy and definitions.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

Part and Inventory Search

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top