Continue to Site

Welcome to EDAboard.com

Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

8 way unequal wilkinson power divider design in AWR

Status
Not open for further replies.

rajendra.jv

Newbie level 2
Joined
Nov 24, 2010
Messages
2
Helped
0
Reputation
0
Reaction score
0
Trophy points
1,281
Activity points
1,294
hi folks..........

i m designing an unequal 8 way(2 way 3 stage) wilkinson power divider. i referred Pozar text book. I got a problem while designing 3rd stage. The problem is that i m getting high branch impedance ( around 300ohm) at last stage. While i m trying to calculate the length and width using AWR transmission calculator, it is saying invalid parameters, has to reduce impedance value.

I successfully designed 8 way equal wilkinson power divider and 4 way unequal wilkinson power divider. But i got struck at 8 way.

Plz do reply a solution for that problem. View attachment 5[/ATTACH][/ATTACH]3405[/ATTACH]
 

Attachments

  • Design of Power divider.doc
    143 KB · Views: 116

Hello Rajendra,

Yes, I went through your problem & found the following…
With the Substrate data you are using I think it is very difficult to get 328 Ohm Microstrip line trace
As I calculated using some free tool it shows that W is too small to fabricate or may not be possible with your process what you have ( I got W= 0.0013 mm from **broken link removed** )

Hence the error message in AWR Transmission Line Calculator (Txline), saying it is practically difficult to realize…

The solution is to use lower Dielectric Constant & Thicker Substrate material such as RT-duroid/RT-duroid5880 (Er=2.2, h=3.175 mm, t=70 um) Which may give impedance around 275 ohms around for W=0.01 mm
Then you have to re-calculate all the Microstrip line for this new substrate….

See the picture below


---manju---
 

I got the solution. We can keep impedance as 50 ohm for the next stage instead of taking previous stage impedance. Then we wont get high impedance values
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top