Continue to Site

Welcome to EDAboard.com

Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

Difference between direct and indirect synthesizers?

Status
Not open for further replies.

vco96

Member level 1
Joined
Mar 16, 2004
Messages
32
Helped
0
Reputation
0
Reaction score
0
Trophy points
1,286
Activity points
317
I'm reffering to signal generators.

Thanks
 

This nomenclature (direct vs. indirect) sound "old".
almost every syntetized generators are "indirect".

Direct:
^^^^^
An array of N fixed frequecncy oscillators (i.e. 1,2,4,8,10,20,40,80,100,200,400,800MHz)
An array of N mixers.
With appropriate switch bank you may get an output freq. from 1 to 1665 MHz with 1 MHz step. Lowest phase noise but expensive and large.

Indirect:
^^^^^^
The PLL are indirect
The minimum step is smaller as the dividing factor is large. Fmax/Fmin depend on VCO and typically is 1 octave. Phase noise is moderately low, in most cases is low enough.

DDS:
^^^^
The waveform of the out signal is "syntetised" point by point.
Extremally low phase noise, but few spuriuos signal near the carrier.
*******
A short note about stability:
Phase noise (or FM noise) far from the carrier depend on synt. technology. But phase noise close to carrier depend to the frequency standard only (i.e. the Quartz).
 

In addition:

DIRECT:

Sweep speed limited by the switch speed (tipically us).
Spurious frequencies reduced up to 100 dBc.
high resolution

DDS (I think iy means DIGITAL Synthesizer):

High sweep speed
high resolution
fmax limited by reference frequency
spurious frequencies (due to D/A converter) may be high (50 - 60 dBc)
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top