Continue to Site

Welcome to EDAboard.com

Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

CST Active Element Pattern

Status
Not open for further replies.

Asim Ali Khan

Junior Member level 3
Joined
Dec 12, 2005
Messages
25
Helped
2
Reputation
4
Reaction score
2
Trophy points
1,283
Activity points
1,471
Hi guys,

I am trying to model an array system and considering the active element pattern approch to include the mutual coupling effect. For this I tried two different approches.

1) I ran a small array simulation with all ports setting and then determined the Z matrix using the CST. I took a stand alone element pattern and multiply it with the general array factor. Then I chose a set of weights e.g p=[1 1 1 1] and multiply it with the Z matrix. Then these corrupted weights are multiplied to the whole array factor;

A=stand alone element pattern
p=[1 1 1 1]
Z=Impedence matrix
I=Z*p corrupted with coupling
TF= sum(r=1:4) I_r *A(theta)*AF(theta) where AF=array factor; TF = total array factor

Now using Matlab I got the pattern with all the coupling effects. But when I apply the same weights p=[1 1 1 1] to CST model it gives a difefrent pattern ... What did I miss here??:|

2) Secondly I am using individual element pattern in the presence of others. so now the coupling effect is on the individual element pattern. Again I use Matlab, determined the pattern;

TF=p*sum(r=1:4)A_r*AF

still the results are not the same as on CST.

Any one has any idea about it??


Thanks in advance
Cheers
 

Hi guys,

I am trying to model an array system and considering the active element pattern approch to include the mutual coupling effect. For this I tried two different approches.

1) I ran a small array simulation with all ports setting and then determined the Z matrix using the CST. I took a stand alone element pattern and multiply it with the general array factor. Then I chose a set of weights e.g p=[1 1 1 1] and multiply it with the Z matrix. Then these corrupted weights are multiplied to the whole array factor;

A=stand alone element pattern
p=[1 1 1 1]
Z=Impedence matrix
I=Z*p corrupted with coupling
TF= sum(r=1:4) I_r *A(theta)*AF(theta) where AF=array factor; TF = total array factor

Now using Matlab I got the pattern with all the coupling effects. But when I apply the same weights p=[1 1 1 1] to CST model it gives a difefrent pattern ... What did I miss here??:|

2) Secondly I am using individual element pattern in the presence of others. so now the coupling effect is on the individual element pattern. Again I use Matlab, determined the pattern;

TF=p*sum(r=1:4)A_r*AF

still the results are not the same as on CST.

Any one has any idea about it??


Thanks in advance
Cheers

Hi Asim Ali Khan,

Did you solve your problem.

I also am studying about phased array of patch antennas including mutual coupling.

So, if you solved your problem, plz share.

Thank you so much!
Rgs
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top