+ Post New Thread
Results 1 to 18 of 18

15th May 2008, 04:46 #1
 Join Date
 Nov 2007
 Posts
 263
 Helped
 20 / 20
 Points
 2,981
 Level
 12
not gate using mux
Can anyone send me a material on NOT ,AND ,XOR,XNOR,NAND,INVERTER using MUX ???
Plz its urgent send me a material i will give u 20 points

15th May 2008, 05:47 #2
 Join Date
 Mar 2008
 Location
 Hyderabad, India
 Posts
 23
 Helped
 11 / 11
 Points
 1,316
 Level
 8
nand using mux
Realization of GATE USING MUX
If any one finds wrong in this reply me
If u other design share with us
with regards
khalandar basha
basha_vlsi@yahoo.co.in[/img]
8 members found this post helpful.

15th May 2008, 06:47 #3
 Join Date
 Nov 2007
 Posts
 263
 Helped
 20 / 20
 Points
 2,981
 Level
 12
mux as inverter
thanks
2 members found this post helpful.

15th May 2008, 06:47

15th May 2008, 06:53 #4
 Join Date
 Jan 2007
 Posts
 208
 Helped
 33 / 33
 Points
 4,334
 Level
 15
mux logic gates
hii basha u missed Nor gate
2 members found this post helpful.

15th May 2008, 07:01 #5
 Join Date
 Mar 2008
 Location
 Hyderabad, India
 Posts
 23
 Helped
 11 / 11
 Points
 1,316
 Level
 8
inverter using mux
hi vlsi technolgy
i hope i designed not gate correctly.
hi venkat_kvr
as he didn't mentioned abt nor gate i didn't draw
and ur's design for nor gate is correct yaar
and thanks for helping out

15th May 2008, 08:08 #6
 Join Date
 Feb 2007
 Posts
 97
 Helped
 7 / 7
 Points
 1,509
 Level
 8
nand inverter
Sorry but really i cant realize what is the advantage of using mux to design those logic gate ? With respect to digital, again you have to use gates to build mux, and with respect to analog surely the number of transistor you are going to use to build a logic gate by mux will more than the no you have to spend to directly build a gate.
Those above designs are effective in which aspect ? Resolution ( i mean true replica of output waveform ) ?

15th May 2008, 08:08

15th May 2008, 08:59 #7
 Join Date
 Feb 2008
 Location
 At home
 Posts
 1,166
 Helped
 123 / 123
 Points
 7,630
 Level
 20
xnor using nand
Originally Posted by atena

19th May 2008, 16:25 #8
 Join Date
 May 2008
 Location
 Munich, Germany
 Posts
 74
 Helped
 15 / 15
 Points
 1,349
 Level
 8
instrucciones nor, xor, and,in, out, not
Originally Posted by AdvaRes
Some designers like to combine muxes as spare cells. If in later stage you need to add logic, you gotta be able to generate your logic from mux structures. Therefore understanding these implementations is important.
Actually one can also use muxes to create memory elements like latches and flip flops. One of my blog posts dealt exactly with that issue, check it out here:
http://asicdigitaldesign.wordpress.c...10muxlogic/
hope this helps,
ND.
2 members found this post helpful.

19th May 2008, 16:25

17th January 2009, 22:08 #9
 Join Date
 Jan 2009
 Posts
 1
 Helped
 1 / 1
 Points
 703
 Level
 5
mux nand
thanks a lot..
1 members found this post helpful.

21st January 2009, 11:49 #10
implement or gate and and gate using mux
I feel we should not mix the advantage of implementation of logic in CMOS comparing the same with implementation of logic using gates.
Each has its own importance. The simple implementation of logic using gates (as we realize mux logic using gates) helps a clearer understanding while the reduced implementation in CMOS provides faster operation (in ns) and smaller area too by reducing the transistor count. Finally it is a logic equation which is being realized.
Just imagine the no. of transistors required to implement XOR gate using individual gates and then using mux ... the difference is clearly visible.
Regards,
Anuj.

21st January 2009, 13:35 #11
 Join Date
 Feb 2008
 Location
 At home
 Posts
 1,166
 Helped
 123 / 123
 Points
 7,630
 Level
 20
how to use a mux as an inverter
Originally Posted by anuj.joamon

12th October 2009, 03:02 #12
 Join Date
 Oct 2009
 Location
 hyd
 Posts
 2
 Helped
 0 / 0
 Points
 570
 Level
 5
Re: AND,NOT,OR,XOR,XNOR,NAND,INVERTER using MUX
and≡
take two cases i.e for a==0,a==1;('a' is a selected line for 2:1mux)
take 0 and b as inputs to mux
if(a==0)
out =0;
elsif(a==1)
out=b;[/img][/code]

12th October 2009, 03:02

18th October 2009, 16:00 #13
 Join Date
 Mar 2009
 Posts
 2
 Helped
 0 / 0
 Points
 686
 Level
 5
AND,NOT,OR,XOR,XNOR,NAND,INVERTER using MUX
thanks guys, does anyone know how to use mux4 to generate Y=a(~b)(~c)+(~b)(~C)+(~a)(~c)...
that will be helpful..
Added after 1 minutes:
FYI just only one mux4

18th February 2010, 08:37 #14
 Join Date
 Apr 2009
 Posts
 1
 Helped
 0 / 0
 Points
 659
 Level
 5
AND,NOT,OR,XOR,XNOR,NAND,INVERTER using MUX
same thing i can get for CMOS i.e. AND,NOT,OR,XOR,XNOR,NAND,INVERTER using CMOS

4th May 2010, 00:49 #15
 Join Date
 May 2010
 Location
 US
 Posts
 2
 Helped
 0 / 0
 Points
 469
 Level
 4
Re: AND,NOT,OR,XOR,XNOR,NAND,INVERTER using MUX
Hi all,
I am a little bit confused on the OR gate.
The OR gate boolean expression is Y = BA' + AA => B(1A) + A => A + B  AB. Shouldn't the OR gate boolean expression be A + B ? However, the definition of OR operation is A U B = A + B  AB. Did I miss anything? Correct me if I am wrong.
Thank you.

4th May 2010, 05:12 #16
 Join Date
 Jan 2008
 Posts
 83
 Helped
 29 / 29
 Points
 1,693
 Level
 9
Re: AND,NOT,OR,XOR,XNOR,NAND,INVERTER using MUX
Hi,
Just to avoid confusion:
B(1A) = B•(1A)
which means "B is *dependent* on the inverse of input A".
Meaning, we only need to check B input if A=0.
B(1A) + A should not be written as (B + A  A•B) to avoid confusion since we are not dealing with normal maths but Boolean logic.
Comparatively, (B + A•B) can be reduced to B using Boolean logic, i.e.:
B + A•B = B
but this is wrong in conventional maths.
So, how do we define the statement (B  A•B) in words for Boolean logic?
BTW, (1  A•B) would define the NAND logic of inputs A & B.
Best regards.

4th May 2010, 18:35 #17
 Join Date
 May 2010
 Location
 US
 Posts
 2
 Helped
 0 / 0
 Points
 469
 Level
 4
Re: AND,NOT,OR,XOR,XNOR,NAND,INVERTER using MUX
Hi,
I guess in this case the boolean multiplication is not like algebra multiplication. Some other cases, like
a
bOR
cAND Y
will get Y = (a+b)•c = ac + bc.
Is there a rule indicates when the boolean multiplication cannot be used as algebra multiplication? How do we derive the b•(1a)+ a to a + b as the OR gate boolean expression?
Thanks.

5th May 2010, 16:40 #18
 Join Date
 Jan 2008
 Posts
 83
 Helped
 29 / 29
 Points
 1,693
 Level
 9
Re: AND,NOT,OR,XOR,XNOR,NAND,INVERTER using MUX
I think we just opened a can of worms !^_^ .
What I was trying to say was, don't expand minus signs.
Safer to leave 1XXXXX as 'inverse of'.
Of course some one out there might be able to make sense of AC.
Best regards.
+ Post New Thread
Please login