Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.
Hi,
back metallization of so called GCPW implies some advantages in terms of surface waves suppression respect to what happens at the the lower air-dielectric interface of conventional CPW, as well as suppressing back-radiation effects in CPW-fed slot and folded slot antennas, resulting in higher directivities. Propagating modes are highly affected by the presence of back-side ground plane. In general, if substrate height is comparable or less with respect to the sum of CPW gaps' and signal line widths, typical microstrip mode starts to overcome the CPW mode and the structure behaves like a microstrip. As substrate height increases and gets greater than 2*CPWgapWidth+CPWlineWidth, the structure modes tend to typical CPW modes.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.