Continue to Site

Welcome to EDAboard.com

Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

cosmos scope tutorial

Status
Not open for further replies.

hr_rezaee

Advanced Member level 3
Joined
Oct 6, 2004
Messages
747
Helped
109
Reputation
218
Reaction score
24
Trophy points
1,298
Location
Iran-Mashhad
Activity points
4,025
cosmosscope tutorial

Hi
I need cosmos scope tutorial.
please upload it.
regards
 

spice explorer tutorial

hello

**broken link removed**

**broken link removed**

google rulez ;)

regards
 

    hr_rezaee

    Points: 2
    Helpful Answer Positive Rating
research scope tutorial

poor tool .. I use cosmos in linux ..

poor than sandwork spiceExplorer .
 

sandwork tutorial

andy2000a said:
poor tool .. I use cosmos in linux ..

poor than sandwork spiceExplorer .

hi
thanks
please explain more about them.
regards
 

cosmoscope linux

I use cosmosScope + hspice 2005.9 on Linux .. and many EDA tool I ever use
from adit hsim nWave(debussy) ...etc

I am use cosmosscope now (company only buy this tool )
1. no small grid desiplay , for compare signal , use spiceExplorer can have
vertial trace , I can compare manyanalog signal .

2. display too slow , when I want to see many signal , cosmoscope one time
drag only one signal ,
spiceExplorer can many signal one time , then expand group
but only one time
because my simulation database is large , if one time only one signal
will take many time for wating ..

3. convert analog -> to digital poor , spiceExplorer is more easy

4. cosmos in "one graph" ,
if I want to zoom some signal , other signal also be zoom
out , I can not every waveform set diffenet "display value range"
but sometime , I need set display value range ...

I use hspice over 7 years .. even awaves is better than cosmoscope
I think cosmoscope is powerful for "data processing & calculate)
awaves is poor on it , but for display waveform , awaves is better than cosmoscope .

by the way, I nevery find cosmoscope can update waveform ..
awaves /spiceExplorer can update sim data . to sum up , I use cosmoscope
feel not friendly for designer ...
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top