Continue to Site

Welcome to EDAboard.com

Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

MASH ( SD modulator) power spectrum dc term

Status
Not open for further replies.
>> Se=(1/12)/(fs/2);
>> Sq=Se*(2*sin(pi*f/fs))^6;

On the book that you suggested, i also saw that formula for the ideal curve. But are you sure it is correct?
According to this , the curve is dependant on the sampling frequency, which as far as i understand it shouldn't be.

Why do you use fs=1GHz ?

I can not believe such high frequency clock for Delta-Sigma-Fractional-N Frequency Synthesizer.

As i wrote above , it shouldn't matter neither on the measured or ideal curve.
On all the formulas, like 2*sin(pi*f/fs), the discrete frequencies are normalized to sampling frequency. So , a change in sampling frequency would also change the discrete frequencies accordingly resulting in a constant ratio f/fs (no matter the fs).

Anyway, i tried with a more realistic sampling frequency ( 40M ) and still don't get near the ideal curve.
Could you also tell me where did you find the formula using " -10*log(binWidth) " when using the fft method ?

Thank you
 

You are misunderdtanding.
Se and Sq have to be dependent on sampling frequency.

Surely learn quantization noise.
Can you understand a concept of over sampling ?

Unless you can not understand such easy thing, you can never go on next.

Could you also tell me where did you find the formula using " -10*log(binWidth) " when using the fft method ?
Not formula at all.
It is no more than kindergarden level common sense of Fourier analysis.
Surely read Schreier book.
 
Last edited:

On the book that you suggested, i also saw that formula for the ideal curve.
But are you sure it is correct?
Of course, correct.

According to this , the curve is dependant on the sampling frequency,
It is very natural.
Can you understand a concept of Over Samplng ?

which as far as i understand it shouldn't be.
Simply, only you are misunderstanding.

As i wrote above , it shouldn't matter neither on the measured or ideal curve.
Wrong.
This is also your misunderstanding.

On all the formulas, like 2*sin(pi*f/fs), the discrete frequencies are normalized to sampling frequency.
This is for frequency domain analysis of NTF(Noise Transfer Function).

So , a change in sampling frequency would also change the discrete frequencies accordingly resulting in a constant ratio f/fs (no matter the fs).
Again wrong.
You are doing time domain simulation.

Surely see your

Spectrum have large variation of -110 ~ -60 at f=fs/2.

You have too many many wrong thought and wrong knowledge.

Good luck you can meet someone who have same thought as you.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top