Continue to Site

Welcome to EDAboard.com

Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

Rise time and fall time of a analog pulse

Status
Not open for further replies.

bilal_oct

Full Member level 1
Joined
Aug 8, 2008
Messages
96
Helped
8
Reputation
16
Reaction score
5
Trophy points
1,288
Activity points
1,950
It is observed that a pulse generated from a detector (scintillator detector with PMT) usually have short rise time i.e. sharp while rising and longer fall time. Does anyone know the reason behind this ?
 

Because your sensing-node impedance is low when the
photoconductive / photovoltaic event is active, and high
once the carriers have been swept out. So you have two
different time constants at play. This will be magnified by
any loading that attends the probe or front end elecronics.

For purposes of illustration, consider a photodiode which
sources 10uA with 10V back-bias, and leaks 10pA, looked
at with a 100fF FET-probe. Assume I-V linearity, although
this is seldom entirely true.

10V/10uA=1Mohm 1Mohm*100fF=100nS rising
10V/10pA=1Gohm 1Gohm*100fF=100uS falling

You could improve the falling edge with a shunt conductance
without badly affecting the rising edge sensitivity - a 10Mohm
shunt, if it adds trivial capacitance, would pull in your fall
time to 1uS while costing you 10% of your input signal
current amplitude.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

Part and Inventory Search

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top