Continue to Site

Welcome to EDAboard.com

Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

Which configuration is better for oscillator - CG or CS?

Status
Not open for further replies.

vagarwal

Member level 2
Joined
Jun 1, 2004
Messages
49
Helped
1
Reputation
2
Reaction score
0
Trophy points
1,286
Location
Asia
Activity points
473
oscillator design

looking at the S parameters of a transistor/FET device, can we tell which configuration would be better for oscillator design - CG or CS?
 

Re: oscillator design

My dear friend :arrow:
the application dictates the choice of the active device (BJT, FET, HEMT ) and also the choice of the topology (whether Common Gate /Common source) and you just can't really choose the topology by just looking at the S-pars; of course you can find out the oscillatory tendency of the device by looking at the mag of S11/S22.
:wink: Generally Common Gate topology is preferred for fixed frequency oscillators where the required tuning range is not much; the regenerative inductor and the Cgs of the acitve device fix the range of the negative resistance and hence reduce the BW.
whereas the Common Source topology provides a larger negative resistance bandwidth (with Cgs being absorbed in the feedback capacitance) is used in VTOs and frequency synthesisers requiring a larger tuning range;
Hope this answers your query.....

bye
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top