Continue to Site

Welcome to EDAboard.com

Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

Please help me out for Gm-C(OTA-C) filter

Status
Not open for further replies.

afujian

Member level 4
Joined
Mar 26, 2010
Messages
70
Helped
2
Reputation
4
Reaction score
1
Trophy points
1,288
Location
china
Activity points
1,715
Hi all,
Recently,I am designing a 7th-order elliptic OTA-C filter,I got the prototype from the software of filtersolution , then replaced the passive components (resistor and inductor)with active components(negative feedback Gm cell for resistor and gyrator for inductor).
The spec of the passive filter is passband=4MHz, stopband =5MHz(Transition-band =1MHz),attenuation=40dB@5MHz.
But,due to the simulation with spectre,the final active filter only has 3.2MHz passband, the attenuation at 5MHz is less than 30dB.
 so,anybody can tell me the reason of the reducing of the passband and the attenuation.
  I have tried for many days,but failed,there will be great appreciation for your help.
  The pictures below are the circuit of the filter ,the gm cell,the ac response of and the response from the filtersolution respectively.

20_1303022304.jpg
  
 

Did you try out the filter by an ideal GM block? Make a macro single pole GM block using a VCCS and resistor capacitor at the output to model the output pole and see what is the bandwidth and gain required for making the system work. Then compare it with you Gm cell and see what is lacking.
 

    V

    Points: 2
    Helpful Answer Positive Rating
Did you consider that the classical (simple) gyrator approach to replace inductors must be applied for grounded inductors only?
 

hi LvW, there are three active floating inductors in the circuit,four gm cells and on capacitor create a floating inductor.
 

OK, I just wanted to pick-up this point.
By the way, why didn't you use the Bruton transformation with the aim to get a topology based on grounded gyrator elements (FDNR approach) ?
 

hi aryajur, I replace the GM cell with ieal vccs, but the result become worse , I will upload the simulation later .
 

The gyrator adds a series resistance to the inductor is that true for your floating inductor gyrator? Maybe you could try simulating an ideal filter circuit with those series resistances added and compare both simulations.
 

I just replaced the Gm cell with the ideal VCCS,the response is as below,the 40dB attenuation frequency is 9MHz.
 

May be the dc gain is not sufficient,I will redesign the OTA
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top