Continue to Site

Welcome to EDAboard.com

Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

65nm process study before doing real design

Status
Not open for further replies.

prcken

Advanced Member level 1
Joined
Nov 1, 2006
Messages
419
Helped
41
Reputation
82
Reaction score
37
Trophy points
1,308
Location
Shanghai
Activity points
4,059
hi all
before doing real analog circuit design in 65nm CMOS process, i want to emulate the device charaterisitics and get to know all the effects that differ from 0.13µm or 0.18µm processes, and what kind of models (gate direct tunneling current model, monte carlo model, mismatch model, etc.) should be included in the spice simulation?
any comments are welcome.
thanks
Kehan
 

hi, kehan,
good question!

hi all
before doing real analog circuit design in 65nm CMOS process, i want to emulate the device charaterisitics and get to know all the effects that differ from 0.13µm or 0.18µm processes, and what kind of models (gate direct tunneling current model, monte carlo model, mismatch model, etc.) should be included in the spice simulation?
any comments are welcome.
thanks
Kehan
 

I strongly advice you to use Silvaco tools.
they have the full design flow, from process characterization to device simulation, with enhanced atomic level analysis (carriers velocity & density, tunneling effects ...).
good luck.
 

I would much rather have a waffle-pack of PCM dice, and a
pad-out, than any amount of simulation. Especially as you are
quite unlikely to obtain the process flow or construction info
any such simulation would need, to be at all accurate.

It's more useful to check the real transistor behaviors against
the PDK models, than to try and "validate" those models from
yet another abstraction.

And in the end you will likely be using the standard models
and discovered "don't do that" / "don't believe that" guides
anyway.
 

I strongly advice you to use Silvaco tools.
they have the full design flow, from process characterization to device simulation, with enhanced atomic level analysis (carriers velocity & density, tunneling effects ...).
good luck.

i think process flow is needed for using TCAD tools like Slivaco , but usually the process flow is confidential.

---------- Post added at 13:29 ---------- Previous post was at 13:21 ----------

I would much rather have a waffle-pack of PCM dice
what does PCM stand for?
good idea, but right now i have no chance to do real silicon measurement in 65nm process :)
 

what does PCM stand for?

Process Control Monitor, an extra die inserted a few times on the wafer (or in the saw lane), containing several standard devices, enabling the measurement of process variations over the wafer and over the lot(s).
 
  • Like
Reactions: prcken

    prcken

    Points: 2
    Helpful Answer Positive Rating
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top