qiushidaren
Full Member level 2
n x p=ni
In Trividis’s book, he says that “With so many free electronics moving around the lattice, the chance of their encountering a hole in their way and filling it, or ‘recombining’ with it, is significant; thus the concentration of holes denoted by p0 decreases compared to that in the intrinsic case. In fact, this chance of recombination is approximately proportional to n0, and thus p0 decreases by the same factor that n0 has increased (compared to the intrinsic case). Hence, the product n0p0 remains the same as in the intrinsic case, …”
I just can't understand these sentences perfectly--In fact, this chance of recombination is approximately proportional to n0, and thus p0 decreases by the same factor that n0 has increased (compared to the intrinsic case). Hence, the product n0p0 remains the same as in the intrinsic case, …
Can someone explain these sentences more intuitive for me to understand, thank you in advance!!!
In Trividis’s book, he says that “With so many free electronics moving around the lattice, the chance of their encountering a hole in their way and filling it, or ‘recombining’ with it, is significant; thus the concentration of holes denoted by p0 decreases compared to that in the intrinsic case. In fact, this chance of recombination is approximately proportional to n0, and thus p0 decreases by the same factor that n0 has increased (compared to the intrinsic case). Hence, the product n0p0 remains the same as in the intrinsic case, …”
I just can't understand these sentences perfectly--In fact, this chance of recombination is approximately proportional to n0, and thus p0 decreases by the same factor that n0 has increased (compared to the intrinsic case). Hence, the product n0p0 remains the same as in the intrinsic case, …
Can someone explain these sentences more intuitive for me to understand, thank you in advance!!!
