Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.
I have got the difference between the book's and my. It is the window 'hann'. When I replace the 'hann(Nfft)' with 'ds_hann(Nfft)', thes same result is got, although I don't know the reason exactly .
Re: Delta Sigma Question
Have you fixed this problem?
My problem is exactly the same as you.
hope your help!
- - - Updated - - -
hello!
can I know what version of matlab you used?
And , can I get your code executed for that example?
thx.
oh, ***, just let me find this.
I meet this problem too. My result is "SNR = 86.1 dB @ OSR = 64" without window, "SNR = 85.7 dB @ OSR = 64" with window. " like the window doesn't work or the toolbox does.
I follow the book step by step, this is my code:
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%...
If it is ture that "it is because of a no. of poles at nodes where the auxiliary amplifiers are connected, lower the UGF of auxiliary amplifier or higher the second pole of main amplifer. To make it more clearly, it's better to give out the performance metric of your main amplifier and...
Welcome myself first, for finding this place to study~~
I was just study IC design. When I learn about osc(relaxtion of one grounded cap), I realize that it is different from othec ckt like Bandgap 、 LDO. It is more complicated, even it's simulation.
to my knowledge, the serval...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
