Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.
yes this was clear since the beginning of this thread (see first posting).
i think i've found the answer concerning the laplace-fourier-relationship of the cos transform:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laplace_transform#Inverse_Laplace_transform (section 4.3.2)
and
**broken link removed** (slide...
thanks for your quick answer.
i will give it a try:
laplace transform of cos(w0*t) =
s / ( s^2 + w0^2 )
-> substitution of s = "sigma + jw" with sigma=0 leads to
jw / ( -w^2 + w0^2 )
= ?
i don't see the way how to get to the fourier transform of cos "1/2 * (delta(f-f0) + delta(f+f0))" after...
hmm, the question is still open: starting with the laplace transform of cos "s/(s^2+w0^2)" and substituting "s=j*w" i'm stuck in the last step mentionned in the first posting.
how to proceed there (explicite steps) to get to the fourier transform of cos?
ok, but this is what i already said in the first posting. the actual question was:
how to use this fact to find the relationship between the "fourier transform of cosinus" and the "laplace transform of cosinus"?
Hello,
I often hear "the Fourier transfer function is equal to the Laplace transfer function with the Laplace variable s replaced by j*w: H(j*w) = H(s)".
Can anyone explain how this applies to cos(w0*t)?
The Fourier transform of cos(w0*t) is "1/2 * ( delta(f-f0) + delta(f+f0) )" (where...
definition of "resistance looking into"
Hello,
in the book "Microelectronic Circuits" (Sedra Smith, 5th Edition, page 446) the emitter resistance is defined as "... the small-signal resistance between base and emitter, looking into the emitter...".
The same formulation is...
Thank you for your quick reply.
So for transfer functions like
s / ( s - w )
and
s / ( s + w )
the pole frequency will always be mentioned as positive number
fp = wp / ( 2 * pi )
independent of the fact that the mathematically correct pole would be -wp or +wp ...(?)
Hello,
in textbooks (for example Sedra Smith, Microelectronic Circuits, Fifth Edition, page 334) one sometimes encounters a formula like:
Vo/Vi = ... * s / ( s + w )
where s is the Laplace variable (s = a + j*b) and w corresponds to the 3-db frequency of the high-pass filter.
Mathematically...
The knot in my head was solved by a lecturer:
gm*Vin equals 0 (since the output impedance Rds (approximation) is infinity and there is no way for the current to flow)
Hence the last equation in the picture leads to Vin=Vx
Hello Ratch,
thank you for your quick response.
I'm interested in finding out more about this "General Immittance Theorem". Do you know where I can find its proof? (I could'nt find any in the web - maybe it's name is different)
Nevertheless for this case I'd like to use Thevenin's theorem...
Hello,
I have a question concerning the derivation of the thevenin equivalent circuit shown on page 16 (upper part) in
https://www-soc.lip6.fr/~hassan/lec3_single_stage.pdf
I know that the small signal equivalent of a diode connected transistor corresponds to a 1/gmb resitor.
It is also clear...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.