| Author |
Message |
eda_wiz
Joined: 07 Nov 2001 Posts: 720 Helped: 30
|
15 Jul 2004 15:35 DC 2000.5 vs DC 2004.06 |
|
|
|
|
Hi all,
Anyone ever noticed the performance improvement when compiling same design in different versions of DC say DC 2000.5 & DC 2004.06
with the same SCRIPT
AREA, TIMING ---How much improvement??
Last edited by eda_wiz on 28 Mar 2006 15:47; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
wadaye
Joined: 18 Jun 2004 Posts: 213 Helped: 10
|
15 Jul 2004 15:50 Re: DC 2000.5 vs DC 2004.06 |
|
|
|
|
| whizkid wrote: |
Hi all,
Anyone ever noticed the performance improvement when compiling same design in different versions of DC say DC 2000.5 & DC 2004.06
with the same SCRIPT
AREA, TIMING ---How much improvement??
Regards
whizkid |
Yes, the DC2004.06 have big improvement of QoR, cpu time. But few
man will compare it with 2000.05. I compare it with 2003.12, the
improvement is significant.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
eda_wiz
Joined: 07 Nov 2001 Posts: 720 Helped: 30
|
15 Jul 2004 15:55 DC 2000.5 vs DC 2004.06 |
|
|
|
|
I actually compared 2003.3 and 2000.05 .. with same script.. I found not much difference in area and timing..
BTW what is QoR
U didnt tell how much improved with new DC
rgds
Last edited by eda_wiz on 28 Mar 2006 15:46; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
wred
Joined: 13 May 2002 Posts: 32 Location: shanghai, PRChina
|
15 Jul 2004 16:04 DC 2000.5 vs DC 2004.06 |
|
|
|
|
| maybe the difference depends on your design size and complex. more large and more complex, more high the performence improves
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
visualart
Joined: 21 Dec 2001 Posts: 588 Helped: 26
|
16 Jul 2004 2:50 DC 2000.5 vs DC 2004.06 |
|
|
|
|
I run a design about MCU,
the cpu time the 2004.06 cost is 1/12,
and the area is 17/23
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Google AdSense

|
16 Jul 2004 2:50 Ads |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
linuxluo
Joined: 26 Jul 2002 Posts: 516 Helped: 4
|
16 Jul 2004 13:24 Re: DC 2000.5 vs DC 2004.06 |
|
|
|
|
hi,
I compare 2003.12 and 2004.06
but only found the run time and area is improved but the timing is the same.
and I heard of option which is XG. does anyone use it?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
edavio
Joined: 23 Dec 2001 Posts: 71
|
16 Jul 2004 17:04 Re: DC 2000.5 vs DC 2004.06 |
|
|
|
|
| QOR stands for quality of result
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |